RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread Balzi Andrea
Thanks All! Now I've about 80MB for child Andrea

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Balzi Andrea wrote: Thanks All! Now I've about 80MB for child Andrea You're distinctly NOT welcome. I don't help folks who outright blacklist whole ISP's with millions of legitimate users in order to prevent a portion of spam. Particularly when that ISP is one I'm using. Perhaps now

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread jdow
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Balzi Andrea wrote: -Original Message- [...] every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? That is a

Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Balzi Andrea
Hi I've the problem with my spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin with exim (MTA) and clamav (AntiVirus). My spamassassin start with the follow command line: /usr/sbin/spamd --syslog=local4 --create-prefs --max-children 10 --max-conn-per-child=100 --helper-home-dir -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid

RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Bowie Bailey
Balzi Andrea wrote: Hi I've the problem with my spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin with exim (MTA) and clamav (AntiVirus). My spamassassin start with the follow command line: /usr/sbin/spamd --syslog=local4 --create-prefs --max-children 10 --max-conn-per-child=100 --helper-home-dir -d

RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Balzi Andrea
-Original Message- [...] every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? That is a bit excessive. My first guess is that you have WAY too

RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Bowie Bailey
Balzi Andrea wrote: -Original Message- [...] every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? That is a bit excessive. My first guess is

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Jeff Chan
On Friday, September 29, 2006, 12:32:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: Balzi Andrea wrote: BLACKLIST_URI You should use the ws.surbl.org version of this blacklist instead. See here for more info: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SURBL Though ws.surbl.org is the direct descendant of

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Matt Kettler
Balzi Andrea wrote: -Original Message- [...] every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? That is a bit excessive. My first