Thanks All!
Now I've about 80MB for child
Andrea
Balzi Andrea wrote:
Thanks All!
Now I've about 80MB for child
Andrea
You're distinctly NOT welcome.
I don't help folks who outright blacklist whole ISP's with millions of
legitimate users in order to prevent a portion of spam. Particularly
when that ISP is one I'm using.
Perhaps now
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Balzi Andrea wrote:
-Original Message-
[...]
every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM.
My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and
Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child?
That is a
Hi
I've the problem with my spamassassin.
I'm using spamassassin with exim (MTA) and clamav (AntiVirus).
My spamassassin start with the follow command line:
/usr/sbin/spamd --syslog=local4 --create-prefs --max-children 10
--max-conn-per-child=100 --helper-home-dir -d
--pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid
Balzi Andrea wrote:
Hi
I've the problem with my spamassassin.
I'm using spamassassin with exim (MTA) and clamav (AntiVirus).
My spamassassin start with the follow command line:
/usr/sbin/spamd --syslog=local4 --create-prefs --max-children 10
--max-conn-per-child=100 --helper-home-dir -d
-Original Message-
[...]
every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM.
My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and
Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child?
That is a bit excessive. My first guess is that you have WAY
too
Balzi Andrea wrote:
-Original Message-
[...]
every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM.
My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and
Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child?
That is a bit excessive. My first guess is
On Friday, September 29, 2006, 12:32:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Balzi Andrea wrote:
BLACKLIST_URI
You should use the ws.surbl.org version of this blacklist instead.
See here for more info:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SURBL
Though ws.surbl.org is the direct descendant of
Balzi Andrea wrote:
-Original Message-
[...]
every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM.
My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and
Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child?
That is a bit excessive. My first