Kelson wrote:
Keith Whyte wrote:
i send viruses to /dev/null but i bounce spam, partly in the vain
hope that some spammers might actually back off after multiple
failures, and mainly in case of false positives, so that the sender
knows the message wasn't delivered.
And just to stave off the pot
Steven Stern wrote:
> If you can get away with the delay, greylisting does an amazing job. I get
> almost no spams with it enabled. Unfortunately, even though it's sent to
> request a retry after 30 seconds from the sender, some senders can take up to
> three hours before retrying.
At SMTP time t
On 01/03/05 03:16 PM, Kelson sat at the `puter and typed:
> Keith Whyte wrote:
> > i send viruses to /dev/null but i bounce spam, partly in the vain hope
> > that some spammers might actually back off after multiple failures, and
> > mainly in case of false positives, so that the sender knows the
Keith Whyte wrote:
i send viruses to /dev/null but i bounce spam, partly in the vain hope
that some spammers might actually back off after multiple failures, and
mainly in case of false positives, so that the sender knows the message
wasn't delivered.
>
> you have total control via configuration
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> David,
>
> I found that option and tried it, but here's what I get now when I run
> spamass-milter:
>
> Jan 3 22:16:09 maze spamass-milter[56478]: Could not extract score from
> J_CHICKENPOX_41,SARE_URI_PILLS autolearn=no version=2.64>
>
> Any ideas?
obile/Emergencies
(516) 908-4185 Fax
http://www.meitech.com/
-Original Message-
From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 5:20 PM
To: Gustafson, Tim
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Any way to block really bad SPAMs?
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Gustafson
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
> "how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
> that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Tim Gustafson
Add the "-r 15" fl
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:45:41 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
> "how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
> that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
I don't use spamas
Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/03/2005 03:50:22 PM:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:45:41 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question
for me is
> >"how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain
score", becau
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:47:44 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>By the way, we reject messages that score above 10 with a 550. We found
>that almost 95% of spam scores over 10, and almost zero ham scores above
>five. Messages scoring between 5 and 10 are accepted, tagged, and
>relayed to their reci
Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Hello
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100 poin
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:45:41 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
>"how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
>that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
>
>Thanks again!
>
T
Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Hello
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100 poin
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:09:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:49:33 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > Hello
> >
> > I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
> > opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) bu
Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
"how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
Thanks again!
Tim Gustafson
MEI Technology Consulting, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(516) 379-0001 Office
(51
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:53:21 -0800, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>At 12:49 PM 1/3/2005, you wrote:
>>I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
>>opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
>>company has some instances where we get things
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:49:33 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hello
>
> I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
> opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
> company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
At 12:49 PM 1/3/2005, you wrote:
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100
Hello
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100 points
without BAYES or a
19 matches
Mail list logo
