> -Original Message-
> From: Dawn Keenan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Anyone seeing this FP?
>
>
> > I'd think sprint would take care o
> I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege
> ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy?
By RFC2822 section 3.6, the only required header fields are the date
and originator address. The Subject field is optional. The Message-ID
SHOULD be pre
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:07:25PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege
> ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy?
According to 2822, Subject is optional, the Message-ID header is also
optional but is list
I suspect that Sprint is doing this to save on text messaging characters
from Cell Phones.
I beleive the message ID is RFC, the subject is just curtesy..
> SprintPCS Phone email causes this:
>
> They are sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], where N is a number
> for phone.
>
> Content analysis details:
SprintPCS Phone email causes this:
They are sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], where N is a number
for phone.
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.2 NO_REAL_NAME
