Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote:
Hi All.
I was scanning my SA log-files, when i noticed that about 30% of the
result: -lines do not contain any BAYES_* score.
Version info:
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.8.4
on Debian and Redhat Linux
The explanation was two-fold:
Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote:
Hi All.
I was scanning my SA log-files, when i noticed that about 30% of the
result: -lines do not contain any BAYES_* score.
Version info:
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.8.4
on Debian and Redhat Linux
The explanation
jdow wrote:
From: Ole Nomann Thomsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All.
I was scanning my SA log-files, when i noticed that about 30% of the
result: -lines do not contain any BAYES_* score.
I suspect that about 30% of your users have an untrained Bayes database.
Thanks, but no: All are scanned
Hi All.
I was scanning my SA log-files, when i noticed that about 30% of the
result: -lines do not contain any BAYES_* score.
Version info:
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.8.4
on Debian and Redhat Linux
Delving deeper, I added this to my user_prefs:
add_header all
From: Ole Nomann Thomsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All.
I was scanning my SA log-files, when i noticed that about 30% of the
result: -lines do not contain any BAYES_* score.
I suspect that about 30% of your users have an untrained Bayes database.
2. Could I ask a few list-members to check