>> I think you've just proved my point. It's too hard to try and
>> determine who to contact in these situations
>
> Do it like Spamcop does with SPAM: Contact *everybody* in the chain, and
> complain to them. Some sort of SPFcop would be nice for that..
cat /var/log/maillog | pflogsumm -d today
Michael Monnerie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do it like Spamcop does with SPAM: Contact *everybody* in the chain, and
> complain to them. Some sort of SPFcop would be nice for that..
Or even use SpamCop itself. Bounces to forged emails are now
considered legitimate for reporting to spamcop. Th
On Montag, 26. Juni 2006 01:36 Gino Cerullo wrote:
> > Spambot A => Recipient Server C => (Bounce) => Forged Email Server
> > D
>
> I think you've just proved my point. It's too hard to try and
> determine who to contact in these situations
Do it like Spamcop does with SPAM: Contact *everybody*
On 25-Jun-06, at 7:22 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
There are at least two ISPs involved:
Spammer A => SMTP Server B => Recipient Server C => (Bounce) =>
Forged Email Server D
I don't think that's the case for most spam these days. For a
On 25-Jun-06, at 7:01 PM, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
Personally, nowadays I believe bouncing messages back to
the alleged
sender
That's not what he's asking. He wants to know whether asking ISPs to
implement SPF checks (where they don't yet check SPF) will work.
I'm not convinced
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
> There are at least two ISPs involved:
>
> Spammer A => SMTP Server B => Recipient Server C => (Bounce) =>
> Forged Email Server D
I don't think that's the case for most spam these days. For a
spambotnet of compromised home systems, you'l
> >> Personally, nowadays I believe bouncing messages back to
> the alleged
> >> sender
> >
> > That's not what he's asking. He wants to know whether asking ISPs to
> > implement SPF checks (where they don't yet check SPF) will work.
>
> I'm not convinced that is what he meant but he wasn't clear
On 25-Jun-06, at 5:51 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Gino Cerullo wrote:
Does it do any good to complain to the ISP that accepted the
original email
with a forged email address that uses a domain name that I
administer?
Personally, nowadays I believe bouncing messages back
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Gino Cerullo wrote:
> > Does it do any good to complain to the ISP that accepted the
> > original email
> > with a forged email address that uses a domain name that I administer?
>
> Personally, nowadays I believe bouncing messages back to the alleged
> sender
That's not
On 25-Jun-06, at 12:58 PM, "Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Does it do any good to complain to the ISP that accepted the original emailwith a forged email address that uses a domain name that I administer?I administer a number of domain names that are being used in the forge
Does it do any good to complain to the ISP that accepted the original email
with a forged email address that uses a domain name that I administer?
I administer a number of domain names that are being used in the forged
email addresses for spam that is sent to recipients on other servers. Some
peo
11 matches
Mail list logo
