in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Can-I-classify-just-a-few-messages-from-the-same-yahoo-newsgroup--tp31606840p31606840.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 05/12, leonardevens wrote:
> But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
> which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all the
> messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I prceed
> to limit such spam without disrupting l
On Thu, 12 May 2011, leonardevens wrote:
But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all
the messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I
prceed to limit such spam without disrup
On Thu, 12 May 2011, leonardevens wrote:
But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all the
messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I prceed
to limit such spam without disrup
On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:51:05 -0700 (PDT), leonardevens
wrote:
> But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
> which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all
the
> messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I
prceed
> to li
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:51:05 -0700 (PDT), leonardevens
> wrote:
>
> > But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
> > which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all
> > the messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I
> >
> I'd say that manual training of spam and ham in such group is needed
> in such cases.
manuel training is sign of to much whitelistning with default score of
-100, most ham here does not even need it, so bayes is here is more passive
on this here, and this makes more sure that ham that is ham i
> > I'd say that manual training of spam and ham in such group is needed
> > in such cases.
On 16.05.11 14:45, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> manuel training is sign of to much whitelistning with default score of
> -100, most ham here does not even need it, so bayes is here is more passive
> on this here
