Well its back. I thought my bayes files had finally caught up to it, or
maybe one of the sa-update downloads did the trick, but now it returns like bad
meatloaf.
It astounds me how this slips under the Bayes radar.
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 06:47, Jack Gostl wrote:
Now that you mention it, yes, it had a Geocities URL.
- Original Message -
From: John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: Dear Homeowner spam
One more
: Dear Homeowner spam
One more reason to permanently blacklist geocities in SURBL IMHO.
Even a better reason for the Spamassassin team to find out how
this spammer manages to consistently evade all filters.
These spams have been slipping through for so long I'm starting
to suspect an inside
- Original Message -
From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: Dear Homeowner spam
John Andersen writes:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 06:47, Jack Gostl wrote:
Now
Homeowner spam
One more reason to permanently blacklist geocities in SURBL IMHO.
Small deployments could get away with it, but if you're a large ISP
you'd never here the end of the complaints about it. My WebRedirect
plugin takes care of geocities spam nicely though.
Even a better reason
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Can someone forward me a copy of the spam in question as an attachment?
Nevermind, I just found one. 16.4 on this particular one. My bayes
rules are scored a little higher than default and I've got a few
additional rules though:
* 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME
On Thursday 11 January 2007 07:37, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
One more reason to permanently blacklist geocities in SURBL IMHO.
Small deployments could get away with it, but if you're a large ISP
you'd never here the end of the complaints about it. My WebRedirect
plugin takes care of
John Andersen wrote:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 07:37, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
One more reason to permanently blacklist geocities in SURBL IMHO.
Small deployments could get away with it, but if you're a large ISP
you'd never here the end of the complaints about it. My WebRedirect
plugin
Now that you mention it, yes, it had a Geocities URL.
- Original Message -
From: John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: Dear Homeowner spam
I've been getting a bunch of spam hawking mortgage rates. You may have seen
it, it starts with Dear Homeowner. Tthe only test that flags this
message is BAYES_50, for all practical purposes a score of 0.
What concerns me the most is that this triggers autolearn=ham. I later
feed this back
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 07:26 -0500, Jack Gostl wrote:
I'm considering lowering the autolearn threshhold to less than zero. I
wonder if anyone else has any thoughts on this as well.
I set the autolearn for ham to -10, so it has to be very hammy to get
learned. Seems to work well.
SA should
Can you post (a link to) an example mesage?
I am pretty sure they are caught in my setup.
-Sietse
From: Jack Gostl
Sent: Wed 03-Jan-07 13:26
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Dear Homeowner spam
I've been getting a bunch of spam hawking mortgage rates. You may have seen
12 matches
Mail list logo