Re: Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread Sebastian Arcus
On 23/12/16 17:02, Andrzej A. Filip wrote: Sebastian Arcus wrote: On 23/12/16 10:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote: I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different bayes results if I

Re: Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread Sebastian Arcus
On 23/12/16 17:18, Paul Stead wrote: On 23/12/2016, 13:35, "Sebastian Arcus" wrote: As soon as I manually delete the SA headers and report in the .eml file, and pass the message again through spamc, I get identical Bayes scores to the ones when the message

Re: Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread RW
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:18:50 + Paul Stead wrote: > Spamassassin ignores certain headers - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm > - note here that within $IGNORED_HDRS we have - > > ---8<--- >

Re: Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread Paul Stead
On 23/12/2016, 13:35, "Sebastian Arcus" wrote: As soon as I manually delete the SA headers and report in the .eml file, and pass the message again through spamc, I get identical Bayes scores to the ones when the message passes initially through Exim -> SA.

Re: Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
Sebastian Arcus wrote: > On 23/12/16 10:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote: >> I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's >> back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different >> bayes results if I test a message on the command line,

Re: Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread Sebastian Arcus
On 23/12/16 10:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote: I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different bayes results if I test a message on the command line, compared to it going through exim -> spamassassin. > >

Re: Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread RW
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:12:54 + Sebastian Arcus wrote: > On the command line it is hitting BAYES_99 and BAYES_999 - while > through Exim it doesn't. ... > What could possibly account for the large discrepancy in bayes > results? If you're running spamd as the spamd user with a global

Different bayes results from command line and through MTA

2016-12-23 Thread Sebastian Arcus
I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different bayes results if I test a message on the command line, compared to it going through exim -> spamassassin. The header of the message received in the