On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:28:01PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> FWIW, there were a lot of domains that weren't including a header list
> at the time of the change. In fact, there still are a lot of domains
> that aren't including a header list like, for example, yahoo-inc.com.
There are s
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Monday 17 July 2006 05:30, Matt Kettler took the opportunity to write:
Robert Nicholson wrote:
Can anybody tell me why the X-Spam headers are put at the top?
Yes, because doing otherwise will break DomainKeys signatures.
As a matter of fact it won't do that unless
a
On Monday 17 July 2006 05:30, Matt Kettler took the opportunity to write:
> Robert Nicholson wrote:
> > Can anybody tell me why the X-Spam headers are put at the top?
>
> Yes, because doing otherwise will break DomainKeys signatures.
As a matter of fact it won't do that unless
a) the signature fie
Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Can anybody tell me why the X-Spam headers are put at the top?
Yes, because doing otherwise will break DomainKeys signatures.
>
> Any chance I can set it so that it always puts the X-Spam headers
> after From:?
You can hack the code to do it, but I'd suggest not doing so b
Can anybody tell me why the X-Spam headers are put at the top?
Any chance I can set it so that it always puts the X-Spam headers
after From:?
