Hi Kris,
At 09:12 09-04-2008, Kris Deugau wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on tuning a large global Bayes db for
stability and sanity? I've got my fingers in the pie of a
moderately large mail cluster, but I haven't yet found a Bayes
configuration that's sane and stable f
John Hardin wrote:
How varied is the character of your message traffic? Is manual learning
an option, especially with larger autolearn thresholds?
What is this... "manual learning"... you speak of?
Not really an option in the short term, although in the long term I'd
*like* to have a syste
> From: Kris Deugau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: ViaNet Internet Solutions
> Reply-To:
> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:36:56 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Large-scale global Bayes tuning?
>
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> Bayes on cluster begs the question: wh
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kris Deugau wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kris Deugau wrote:
> autolearn is picking up ~1.5M+ from ~300K messages on a daily basis.
Push your autolearn thresholds out to reduce the overall volume of learned
spam and ham?
I've thought about that. It m
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kris Deugau wrote:
autolearn is picking up ~1.5M+ from ~300K messages on a daily basis.
Push your autolearn thresholds out to reduce the overall volume of
learned spam and ham?
I've thought about that. It makes it more difficult to get Bayes data
on
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Bayes on cluster begs the question: what if you didn't replicate the bayes
tables, and left them server specific?
It may yet take that. :( (If only for overall cluster reliability -
any one of the current three machines could handle the current load
without any trou
> From: Kris Deugau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: ViaNet Internet Solutions
> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:12:43 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Large-scale global Bayes tuning?
>
> Anyone have any suggestions on tuning a large global Bayes db for
> stability and sanit
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kris Deugau wrote:
autolearn is picking up ~1.5M+ from ~300K messages on a daily basis.
Push your autolearn thresholds out to reduce the overall volume of learned
spam and ham?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have any suggestions on tuning a large global Bayes db for
stability and sanity? I've got my fingers in the pie of a moderately
large mail cluster, but I haven't yet found a Bayes configuration that's
sane and stable for any extended period. Wiping it completely abo
Mike Fahey wrote:
Just upgraded to 3.2.4.
I am running spamassasin as a normal user, not root.
I keep seeing this in the log files.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/sabayes/.spamassassin/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: File exists
There are about 20 lock files in the directory.
Is spamass
disk space,
permissions or the fact you have autoexpire turned on. Double check
the permissions on your folders and make sure the user you run
SpamAssassin under has the right privs required. Stop SA, clean up
the files, and try restarting.
A good idea (if you're running global ba
Just upgraded to 3.2.4.
I am running spamassasin as a normal user, not root.
I keep seeing this in the log files.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/sabayes/.spamassassin/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: File exists
There are about 20 lock files in the directory.
Is spamassassin not cleaning
> -Original Message-
> From: Magnus Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 5:40 PM
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have read this thread,
> http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=819176&framed=y
>
> This is also what I am searching for to do. Make SpamAssassin scor
his work?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Global-Bayes-and-AWL-tf4618683.html#a13190805
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> I am looking into switching from a global bayes/awl/setting environment
> to a per-user environment with MySQL as a backend.
>
>
> Would anyone care to offer an opinion as to whether and/or to what
> degree this might make in overall effectiveness? Anyone back up that
> o
No comments whatsoever?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I am looking into switching from a global bayes/awl/setting environment
to a per-user environment with MySQL as a backend.
Would anyone care to offer an opinion as to whether and/or to what
degree this might make in overall effectiveness? Anyone back up that
opinion with cold hard facts?
Will
Hello,
SA 3.1.4
exec /usr/bin/spamd -v -m 32 -D -q -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
I am using vpopmail installation, and use /user perfs, for /user bayes and
other user conf is stored in SQL.
Problem:
If a mail comes in, and no real vpopmail user is present (smtproutes), than
SA pick's a random real
I guess the subject line says it all. I'm running SA 3.1.1 with Bayes stored
in MySQL. Is it possible to learn messages as a "global" user and have the
tokens apply when evaluating individual users' email? (Never mind if it
would be truly effective; this is more of a theoretical question.)
bump
--- Michael Monnerie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My users are quite happy
> > with overall markup of the spam. We occasionally get a HAM marked as
> > SPAM. We have an odd client base though.
>
> The question is: when to use global and when per-user bayes?
>
> On our server, we have p
On Mittwoch, 9. November 2005 08:04 Gary W. Smith wrote:
> My users are quite happy
> with overall markup of the spam. We occasionally get a HAM marked as
> SPAM. We have an odd client base though.
The question is: when to use global and when per-user bayes?
On our server, we have people of dif
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Michael Parker wrote:
Oh, you want an entirely different Bayes storage module, one that
doesn't exist. You're more than welcome to create your own, perldoc
Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore to get a sense of the API that you must
implement. I'll leave the issues surrounding co
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>
> Right, but this isn't exactly what I was looking for. Basically, I'm
> looking for a system whereby if a users bayes corpus isn't primed
> properly, it can refer to others, as sort of an if --> then system,
> rather than manually overriding it.
>
> As SQL beco
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Michael Parker wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:04 AM 9/8/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
As my bayes database and my training of spamassassin is much better
than that of most of my users...
Is there any way t
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> At 05:04 AM 9/8/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>>
>>> As my bayes database and my training of spamassassin is much better
>>> than that of most of my users...
>>>
>>> Is there any way to augment user bayes DB w
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:04 AM 9/8/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
As my bayes database and my training of spamassassin is much better than
that of most of my users...
Is there any way to augment user bayes DB with a call to mine?
one way is in your local.cf just
At 05:04 AM 9/8/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
As my bayes database and my training of spamassassin is much better than
that of most of my users...
Is there any way to augment user bayes DB with a call to mine?
one way is in your local.cf just set everyone to use the same bayes
datab
Hey all,
As my bayes database and my training of spamassassin is much better than
that of most of my users...
Is there any way to augment user bayes DB with a call to mine? (and/or
mailnull's, which is the default catch-all box for a few domains with only
one valid address and a ton of dicti
Hello,
Edit the $HOME/.spamassassin/userprefs file and add :
bayes_path $PATH to db
Then also add the same bayes_path into the local.cf file.
Regards
Zaine
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 22:16, Matt wrote:
> What do I have to do to get spamassassin to use a global bayes
> databa
Matt wrote:
What do I have to do to get spamassassin to use a global bayes
database for all users on the system, rather then per user?
read the wiki :)
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
Matt wrote:
What do I have to do to get spamassassin to use a global bayes
database for all users on the system, rather then per user?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
Steven
--
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.mrchuckles.net
What do I have to do to get spamassassin to use a global bayes
database for all users on the system, rather then per user?
32 matches
Mail list logo
