On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kris Deugau wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kris Deugau wrote:
> autolearn is picking up ~1.5M+ from ~300K messages on a daily basis.
Push your autolearn thresholds out to reduce the overall volume of learned
spam and ham?
I've thought about that. It makes it more difficult to get Bayes data
on the critical messages in that middle range though. :(
How varied is the character of your message traffic? Is manual learning an
option, especially with larger autolearn thresholds?
Then at least you'd be able to reseed your bayes with a known-good corpus.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
People seem to have this obsession with objects and tools as being
dangerous in and of themselves, as though a weapon will act of its
own accord to cause harm. A weapon is just a force multiplier. It's
*humans* that are (or are not) dangerous.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4 days until Thomas Jefferson's 265th Birthday
