On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Sergio wrote:
I use MailScanner to check on my emails and I have not yet found a way to
train Bayes, I will check on that.
That's going to be critical.
On the mean time, I have learned not to check in "ALL" headers, I have
redefined my first rules and now I have seen a b
Thank you Adam,
I have been working hard in learning a lot of things about antispam rules
and I appreciate all the inputs that the list is giving to me.
I use MailScanner to check on my emails and I have not yet found a way to
train Bayes, I will check on that.
On the mean time, I have learned no
Summary for the impatient:
Do not write rules like this.
Instead, train Bayes, make sure you're using DNSBLs.
On 11/25/2011 09:49 AM, Sergio wrote:
> I wrote all the HELO spammers that SA didn't caught
...
> header CHARLY_RULE1ALL =~ /(...)/i
> describe CHARLY_RULE1Charly Spammers
> scor
