Evan Platt wrote:
> Agreeed. OoO is pointless. No point in it. I can't count how
> many times I
> post to a list, and get an e-mail back that "I am out of the office.
> Contact Joe @ XXX-XXX- in my absence. Until the OoO reply can be
> configured to not reply to spam, not reply to group mails,
At 07:50 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote:
If you are that concerned about what information is revealed in out of
office autoreplies, you should not be allowing OoO autoreplies externally
anyway. They pose a far greater security risk in terms of leaking
information that can be used in social engineering
Thanks for the ideas, procmail will not help, as not all of my email
users are local,
I will look at mimedefang for this, although the other points mentioned
here do have a point, also defining global rules to ignore the spam
message for OoO message is too complicated for any email system i kno
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
If you are that concerned about what information is revealed in out of
office autoreplies, you should not be allowing OoO autoreplies
externally anyway. They pose a far greater security risk in terms of
leaking information that can be used in social engineering attacks
If you are that concerned about what information is revealed in out of
office autoreplies, you should not be allowing OoO autoreplies
externally anyway. They pose a far greater security risk in terms of
leaking information that can be used in social engineering attacks than
the risk you are w
Hi,
I have a question, and hope someone has a solution,
I run Spamassassin 2.63 site-wide with sendmail and spamass-milter.
When an email is marked as SPAM, the headers are added, and the subject
is changed, now lets assume some particular user has enabled "Out of the
office" , the "bounced" mess
