Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-21 Thread Ryan Coleman
I figured out a way to get the spamd user to scan the spam folders. Definitely helping. applying email in the inbox that have been read to the HAM is next on the list. > On Oct 20, 2015, at 9:39 AM, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:29:27 -0500 > Ryan Coleman wrote: > >> >>> On Oct 20, 2

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-20 Thread RW
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:29:27 -0500 Ryan Coleman wrote: > > > On Oct 20, 2015, at 8:21 AM, RW wrote: > > > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:14:42 +0300 > > Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > >> On 10/20/2015 12:41 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > >>> Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a > >

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-20 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 10/20/2015 9:29 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: On Oct 20, 2015, at 8:21 AM, RW wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:14:42 +0300 Jari Fredriksson wrote: On 10/20/2015 12:41 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be scanned as spam and anything that

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-20 Thread Ryan Coleman
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 8:21 AM, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:14:42 +0300 > Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> On 10/20/2015 12:41 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >>> Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder >>> to be scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, an

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-20 Thread RW
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:14:42 +0300 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > On 10/20/2015 12:41 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > > Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder > > to be scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, and > > read, is indeed ham. > > > > I just have to re-

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-20 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 10/20/2015 12:41 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, and read, is indeed ham. I just have to re-investigate the ./new and ./cur folders to make sure they will operate how I

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.10.15 17:30, Ryan Coleman wrote: I actually get THOUSANDS of emails a day. Most of it is spam. And not caught by SA. And when it is put into the spam folder it is not learned. But, hey, you know… you obviously know me better than me so why don’t you have this back and forth publicly with

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.10.2015 um 00:30 schrieb Ryan Coleman: I actually get THOUSANDS of emails a day. Most of it is spam. And not caught by SA. And when it is put into the spam folder it is not learned sounds like you train the wrong bayes at all (a repeatly happening problem of newbies) and so better look

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Eric Wong
Ryan Coleman wrote: > That’s more information than Dovecot gives for the structure, so that will > help. > > Do you happen to know what the other flags mean? http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html My inotify setup posted earlier relies only on the 'S' flag and alphabetical ordering of flags.

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
That’s more information than Dovecot gives for the structure, so that will help. Do you happen to know what the other flags mean? Examples I have: Tch Tad STad Sade Sadg RSad FRSadfi F I presume is flagged - that email (the last one) is definitely one I flagged in Apple Mail. The “fi” seems to

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 6:48 PM, Bill Cole > wrote: > > On 19 Oct 2015, at 17:21, Ryan Coleman wrote: > >> Ok so it was established I don’t have a ham scan (correct). So how do I do >> it so that it only scans the read emails in a MAILDIR? > > Assuming your delivery and client access mechanism

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Bill Cole
On 19 Oct 2015, at 17:21, Ryan Coleman wrote: Ok so it was established I don’t have a ham scan (correct). So how do I do it so that it only scans the read emails in a MAILDIR? Assuming your delivery and client access mechanisms (IMAP4/POP3/whatever) follow standard Maildir behavior & naming,

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
Thanks, I’m going to read about it tonight. > On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Eric Wong wrote: > > Ryan Coleman wrote: >> Ok so it was established I don’t have a ham scan (correct). So how do >> I do it so that it only scans the read emails in a MAILDIR? > > Since 2008, I use inotify (via incrond

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Eric Wong
Ryan Coleman wrote: > Ok so it was established I don’t have a ham scan (correct). So how do > I do it so that it only scans the read emails in a MAILDIR? Since 2008, I use inotify (via incrond) on Maildirs: http://mid.gmane.org/20140822083434.ga8...@dcvr.yhbt.net

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 20.10.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Ryan Coleman: >>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 19.10.2015 um 23:41 schrieb Ryan Coleman: Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.10.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Ryan Coleman: On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.10.2015 um 23:41 schrieb Ryan Coleman: Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, and read, is indeed ha

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 19.10.2015 um 23:41 schrieb Ryan Coleman: >> Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be >> scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, and read, is indeed >> ham. > > do what you want - everybod

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Dave Warren
On 2015-10-19 14:41, Ryan Coleman wrote: Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, and read, is indeed ham. I just have to re-investigate the ./new and ./cur folders to make sure they will operate how I wan

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.10.2015 um 23:41 schrieb Ryan Coleman: Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, and read, is indeed ham. do what you want - everybody else on this world is selecting messages and not rely on a rea

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
Actually it makes absolute sense since I dump my spam into a folder to be scanned as spam and anything that is still in my inbox, and read, is indeed ham. I just have to re-investigate the ./new and ./cur folders to make sure they will operate how I want. But if the email was delivered to my pho

Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.10.2015 um 23:21 schrieb Ryan Coleman: Ok so it was established I don’t have a ham scan (correct). So how do I do it so that it only scans the read emails in a MAILDIR? that makes no sense train a spcific ham and a specific spam folder where you move messages you are sure how to clas

Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
Ok so it was established I don’t have a ham scan (correct). So how do I do it so that it only scans the read emails in a MAILDIR? — Ryan