On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.2; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.2; # triggers spam evasive actions (e.g. blocks mail)
That seems a little aggressiv
John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
>
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.2; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.2; # triggers spam evasive actions (e.g. blocks
mail)
>>
>>> That seems a little aggressive to me. Personally I'd pref
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.2; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.2; # triggers spam evasive actions (e.g. blocks mail)
That seems a little aggressive to me. Personally I'd prefer a larger
margin of error for FPs, and
> > $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.2; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
> > $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.2; # triggers spam evasive actions (e.g. blocks
> > mail)
> That seems a little aggressive to me. Personally I'd prefer a larger
> margin of error for FPs, and would set the discard level t
On 06/07/11 09:17, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
I think many people run with tag at 5.0 and discard at 10.0
I should have mentioned that we are running amavisd-new. I thought that was the
de facto way of integrating spamassassin into a mail gateway, but reading this
list reveals that most people pro
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.2; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.2; # triggers spam evasive actions (e.g. blocks mail)
That seems a little aggressive to me. Personally I'd prefer a larger
margin of error for FPs, and
On 7/6/11 4:17 AM, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
I think many people run with tag at 5.0 and discard at 10.0
I should have mentioned that we are running amavisd-new. I thought that was the
de facto way of integrating spamassassin into a mail gateway, but reading this
list reveals that most people prob
> I think many people run with tag at 5.0 and discard at 10.0
I should have mentioned that we are running amavisd-new. I thought that was the
de facto way of integrating spamassassin into a mail gateway, but reading this
list reveals that most people probably doesn't do that. Makes me wonder if
The default spam threshold, and the one that all of the generated scores
are targeted at, is 5.0 - you already seem to be running at an elevated
score, so I wouldn't see any issues with dropping your tag score back to
the default of 5.0
I think many people run with tag at 5.0 and discard at 10.0
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
We still get quite a bit of spam through and instead of fiddling with
scores, I was thinking about lowering the threshold. Currently tag is at
6.2 and kill at 6.9. Would it be unwise to lower these? What thresholds
are other people on this list using?
Currently I have it at 4.8
Quoting Lars Jørgensen :
Hi,
We still get quite a bit of spam through and instead of fiddling
with scores, I was thinking about lowering the threshold. Currently
tag is at 6.2 and kill at 6.9. Would it be unwise to lower these?
What thresholds are other people
Hi,
We still get quite a bit of spam through and instead of fiddling with scores, I
was thinking about lowering the threshold. Currently tag is at 6.2 and kill at
6.9. Would it be unwise to lower these? What thresholds are other people on
this list using?
--
Lars
12 matches
Mail list logo
