Karsten,
You're correct in they both have scores. I was not paying close
attention to the headers and also you're correct about my confusion
with defualt SA headers and Amavisd-new headers. I didn't realize
Amavisd used custom SA headers for messages.
Thanks for clarifying this!
-Carlos
On
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
They'd normally be in local.cf and are needed for any of the URIBL etc
blacklists to work correctly. See:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#network_test_options
I guess I am
My headers look like:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on mail.iamghost.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=6.3
tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.3.0
*
The message scored a 1.0 (score=1.0) but the
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 14:28 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
I guess I am still lost. SA appears to be working and everything looks
fine however my emails don't appear to be getting a score and I don't
understand how that link applies to why SA isn't setting a score on my
messages when it is
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
Post the entire message to pastebin or a similar site and send the URL
here together with your explanation of what happened so we have
something to work with.
I am sorry I didn't post enough data.
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 08:18 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
Post the entire message to pastebin or a similar site and send the URL
here together with your explanation of what happened so we have
something to work with.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
That 'male enhancement junk' advert may well contain something that
could be the basis of an additional rule - don't omit *anything* in
future, at least until you understand how to write custom rules.
Spammers often
On 11.3.2010 15:18, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
Post the entire message to pastebin or a similar site and send the URL
here together with your explanation of what happened so we have
something to work with.
I am sorry I
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
You still posted not enough data. There is only the headers the link.
Here is the entire message:
http://pastebin.com/MtXWXdvc
On 11.3.2010 16:41, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
You still posted not enough data. There is only the headers the link.
Here is the entire message:
http://pastebin.com/MtXWXdvc
That is hard. Only one URL in the body.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
That is hard. Only one URL in the body.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:11 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
That 'male enhancement junk' advert may well contain something that
could be the basis of an additional rule - don't omit *anything* in
future, at least until
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
You certainly changed the required score: the default is 5.0. The
standard rule scores are set on that basis. Mine are:
required_score 6.0
rewrite_header subject SPAM:
report_safe 1
use_bayes
Hello,
Am 2010-03-10 22:17:05, schrieb Carlos Mennens:
OK so today I got my 1st spam email from someone at a yahoo.com email
address. Basically SA didn't score it at all and 'Postgray' did it's
job. Below are the headers from SA:
Be happy, you got only one...
My question is what do you
OK so today I got my 1st spam email from someone at a yahoo.com email
address. Basically SA didn't score it at all and 'Postgray' did it's
job. Below are the headers from SA:
X-spam-checker-version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on mail.iamghost.com
X-spam-level:
X-spam-status: No, score=0.0
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 22:17 +, Carlos Mennens wrote:
OK so today I got my 1st spam email from someone at a yahoo.com email
address. Basically SA didn't score it at all and 'Postgray' did it's
job. Below are the headers from SA:
Thats not a lot to go on: only a few headers and no message
16 matches
Mail list logo
