mikemacfr wrote:
> OK, but isn't spamd the "settings" file for spamassassin?
> How does spamassassin know how to work if spamd is not used when
> amavis is doing the routing?
The way it works is that Amavis uses SpamAssassin routines to score
the mail and then uses its own settings to decide what
Mike, with all due respect, these questions show you have not
> read one word of the documentation.
>
> --
> _________________
> John Andersen
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OS-X-Server-spam-still-getting-through-%3A-%28-tf2206629.html#a6130515
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:14, mikemacfr wrote:
> OK, but isn't spamd the "settings" file for spamassassin?
No.
> How does spamassassin know how to work if spamd is not used when amavis is
> doing the routing?
Amavis calls spamassassin directly.
Mike, with all due respect, these questio
Do this stats from our server give you (or anyone else) any clue about
whats
causing
spam to get through?
http://65.170.183.59:16080/amavis-stats/
This can only be a guess without more data. However it is obvious your mail
volume is up greatly in the past two months, and the spam detection r
OK, but isn't spamd the "settings" file for spamassassin?
How does spamassassin know how to work if spamd is not used when amavis is
doing the routing?
And if spamassissin is still the "anti-spammer" where do I tell it that
it's
not doing
SA is a really big bunch of perl modules that process
us, and some other more rarely used options) and then (optionally)
> hands it back to your MTA for delivery via yet another engine, procmail,
> cyrus, etc.
>
> Its glue-ware.
> --
> _
> John Andersen
>
>
--
View this message i
ack to your MTA for delivery via yet another engine, procmail,
> cyrus, etc.
>
> Its glue-ware.
> --
> _________________
> John Andersen
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OS-X-Server-spam-still-getting-through-%3A-%28-tf2206629.html#a6120705
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:18, mikemacfr wrote:
> I'm a bit confused?
>
> I thought amavis was the virus scanner bit? And spamassassin took care of
> the spam bit?
Amavis is a router sort of.
It takes mail from your mta, sends it thru one or more engines (spamassassin,
antivirus, and som
f you start seeing hit information in your messages they will show
> moderately well whether you are using network tests, since typically some
> of
> the network test rule anmes should show up on almost any spam.
>
> Loren
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
Edit your spamd start-up script, or start-up options file (depending on
which OS you're running, these may be different). There should be a -L or
--local switch in that file. Remove it to enable network tests.
I have commented out this line in the spamd file and done a restart. So
this
may have
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 12:49 -0700, mikemacfr wrote:
> Ok, one of the first replies to this thread pointed to:
>
> Have you checked out http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSpamAssassin
> ("Spam getting through?")?
>
>
> Which I have looked at and saw the following there:
>
> Edit your spa
e trust path, since that is a common
> misconfiguration. We will be able to tell that from the headers.
>
> Loren
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OS-X-Server-spam-still-getting-through-%3A-%28-tf2206629.html#a6115926
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Assuming you also restarted amvis so it will see the change, you should now
be getting some more headers in your mail messages. You should see headers
similar to the following in a typical non-spam mail:
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on
morticia.wiza
> -Original Message-
> From: mikemacfr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 1:55 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OS X Server spam still getting through :-(
> (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26144-09; Sat, 2
;> at the moment, so you want me to change 2.0 to -99?
>
> Yes. At 2.0, it means that a spam will have to score 2.0 or greater
> before amavis logs the spam detection info.
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OS-X-
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 10:59 -0700, mikemacfr wrote:
> This reads $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0; # add spam info headers if at, or
> above that level;
>
> at the moment, so you want me to change 2.0 to -99?
Yes. At 2.0, it means that a spam will have to score 2.0 or greater
before amavis logs the spa
e is located. This will report the
> SA info in the mail logs for any mail scored greater than -99.
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OS-X-Server-spam-still-getting-through-%3A-%28-tf2206629.html#a6115089
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
ar, that he might be off the team, but of
course, a close personal friendship with the captain does help. . . ." m1
What sort of spams are making it through? Stock spams? Or just all the
usual stuff? You may not be running any addon rule sets, and SA out of the
box isn't as good as it
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 09:59 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > In the meantime ere is the mail I got based on your reply!
>
> > MTA-Interface: amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at mail.powerconsult.no
> > X-Spam-Scanned: using SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) at
> > mail.powerconsult.no
>
> It looks like
In the meantime ere is the mail I got based on your reply!
MTA-Interface: amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at mail.powerconsult.no
X-Spam-Scanned: using SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) at
mail.powerconsult.no
It looks like you are using amvis-new to integrate SA in to the mail chain.
One of its
6 04:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nabble Alerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OS X Server spam still getting through :-(
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_Part_543_9535095.1157198043606"
MTA-Interface: amavisd-new-2.3.
On Saturday 02 September 2006 12:31, mikemacfr took the opportunity to say:
> I'm completely new to this list and am not a UNIX person.
>
> I have SpamAssassin 3.1.4 installed on our mail server together with
> Squirrel and Amavis-new.
>
> Spam is still getting through at an unacceptable rate and I
nyone who could help me with this?
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OS-X-Server-spam-still-getting-through-%3A-%28-tf2206629.html#a6111393
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
23 matches
Mail list logo
