SM wrote:
At 10:06 24-04-2008, Johnson, S wrote:
Thanks for the input. I'm using:
Postfix (I drop a ton of connections before the mail is even allowed
in to my filters)
- 6 RBLs
- malformed email tests
Spamassassin
mimedefang
razor2
dcc
pyzor
bayes lists
Mailscanner
If you have
At 08:03 25-04-2008, John Rudd wrote:
I believe he's calling SpamAssassin during the SMTP session, using
mimedefang (a milter). Mailscanner doesn't let you do that (at
least, not the last time I used it; it didn't have milter bindings).
He's using Mailscanner as well. That package includes
SM wrote:
At 08:03 25-04-2008, John Rudd wrote:
I believe he's calling SpamAssassin during the SMTP session, using
mimedefang (a milter). Mailscanner doesn't let you do that (at least,
not the last time I used it; it didn't have milter bindings).
He's using Mailscanner as well. That
After months of doing a great job, I started to get spam back into my
system again.
Apr 23 16:26:06 mail sqlgrey: grey: new: 82.67.64.191(82.67.64.191),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 23 16:26:06 mail postfix/smtpd[23130]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
From: Johnson, S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:33 -0500
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Conversation: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail
Subject: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail
After months of doing a great job, I started to get spam back into my system
again.
Apr
On Thu, April 24, 2008 16:27, Johnson, S wrote:
It sucks that they are now starting to re-queue their stupid spam; why
don't they GET A CLUE that we don't want their [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why not block the ip ?
or:
1: accept if spf is pass
2: accept if dkim signed
else reject
Benny Pedersen
Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:12 AM
To: Johnson, S; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail
From: Johnson, S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:33 -0500
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Conversation
At 07:27 24-04-2008, Johnson, S wrote:
After months of doing a great job, I started to get spam back into
my system again.
Apr 23 16:26:06 mail sqlgrey: grey: new: 82.67.64.191(82.67.64.191),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 23 16:26:06 mail
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, SM wrote:
It's trivial for malware engines to retry. There isn't any queueing, as
a standard MTA does, being done. This has been happening since some
time. Greylisting only fails if you rely on it to stop spam.
Greylisting, like any other antispam technique, blocks
Johnson, S wrote:
It’s not listed on any of the RBLs yet.
Actually, 82.67.64.191 is currently listed on the following DNSBLs:
FiveTenSig
HostKarma
PSBL
UceProtect-1
NoMoreFunn
But SOME of those are too FP-risky to outright block on, and I don't
know if any of these listings existed at the
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, SM wrote:
It's trivial for malware engines to retry. There isn't any queueing,
as a standard MTA does, being done. This has been happening since
some time. Greylisting only fails if you rely on it to stop spam.
Greylisting, like any other antispam
about dkim? Am I missing anything that I can look at?
Regards,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hoogendyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:27 AM
To: SpamAssassin Users List
Subject: Re: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 24
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail
Johnson, S wrote:
It's not listed on any of the RBLs yet.
Actually, 82.67.64.191 is currently listed on the following DNSBLs:
FiveTenSig
HostKarma
PSBL
UceProtect-1
NoMoreFunn
But SOME of those are too FP-risky to outright block
At 10:06 24-04-2008, Johnson, S wrote:
Thanks for the input. I'm using:
Postfix (I drop a ton of connections before the mail is even allowed
in to my filters)
- 6 RBLs
- malformed email tests
Spamassassin
mimedefang
razor2
dcc
pyzor
bayes lists
Mailscanner
If you have Mailscanner, you
14 matches
Mail list logo
