On Thursday 30 September 2010 06:57:15 Gerald Turner wrote:
> "Hans-Werner Friedemann" writes:
> > Hi @ all
> >
> > what´s the matter with pyzor if I get the following hint by starting
> > spamd?
> > Wed Sep 29 11:23:29 2010 [5176] info: zoom: able to use 675/1223
> > 'body_0' compiled rules (
It´s obfuscating!
Today it works fine..
Thanks anyway...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerald Turner [mailto:gtur...@unzane.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. September 2010 06:57
An: Hans-Werner Friedemann
Cc: spamassassin
Betreff: Re: Pyzor problem
"Hans-Werner Friedemann&quo
"Hans-Werner Friedemann" writes:
> Hi @ all
>
> what´s the matter with pyzor if I get the following hint by starting
> spamd?
>
> Wed Sep 29 11:23:29 2010 [5176] info: urlredirect: No redirectors!
> Wed Sep 29 11:23:29 2010 [5176] info: zoom: able to use 675/1223 'body_0'
> compiled rules (55.19
Hi @ all
what´s the matter with pyzor if I get the following hint by starting spamd?
Wed Sep 29 11:23:29 2010 [5176] info: urlredirect: No redirectors!
Wed Sep 29 11:23:29 2010 [5176] info: zoom: able to use 675/1223 'body_0'
compiled rules (55.192%)
Wed Sep 29 11:23:39 2010 [5176] info: pyzor
Rose, Bobby wrote:
> I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who
> maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover.
The alternative server aparently never got added to the discovery
service so the discover command will reset the contents to the original
I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who
maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover.
http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=117911370318308
_
http://liveearth.msn.com
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: pyzor problem.
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Gary V wrote:
> >We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
> >
> >User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've noticed a big jum
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Gary V wrote:
> >We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
> >
> >User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
> > > like my system is not getting pyzor to resp
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
> like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
>
> When I do a "spamassassin --lint -D"
>
> I show:
>
>
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
> like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
>
> When I do a "spamassassin --lint -D"
>
> I show:
>
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I do a "spamassassin --lint -D"
I show:
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor: got response: 66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError:
debug: Pyzor: could
Mark wrote:
In Pyzor.pm, "internal error" is actually a mask for the infamous error:
"Traceback (most recent call last): ..."
Yeah, there are certain types of input that Pyzor chokes on, like
messages with bogus character encodings. Unfortunately, development
stopped before it was fixed to
> "Oct 20 18:45:11 localhost spamd[30610]: pyzor: check
> failed: internal error"
X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature
iQEVAwUARToIoDFqW1BleBN9AQF38Qf/U/m4cy0ZI+PvfPniPhpWXyu0uJVVRNnI
PYsMFZh/VsAVUPH8hNiKBb6vjdQTKdomz0VUVmpzZ9qybQuxRljey/TPrlsrGQY1
7oj9wyjN0ilcYyWpBq53MoICwgMn
Hi,I need help to figure out what is going wrong with pyzor.The problem:-I saw many line like this in the log:"Oct 20 18:45:11 localhost spamd[30610]: pyzor: check failed: internal error"
What I know:-Pyzor work because I have 397 email tagged by pyzor today.My setup:-Linux debian unstable-SA from
14 matches
Mail list logo
