Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is
free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record. Here's how you would configure your
dom
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your highest
numbered fake MX record. Here's how you would configure your doma
- Original Message -
>Marc Perkel wrote:
>> Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
>> at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
>> and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your highest
>> numbered fake MX record.
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record. Here's how you would config
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record. Here
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record. He
Marc Perkel wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbere
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Randy Ramsdell wrote:
>
> > DAve wrote:
> >
> > > Marc Perkel wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
> > > > and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list.
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
If you just want IPs, maybe instead of running an SMTP service that
450s, you would want to use a packet filter like iptables instead. You
could get the IPs simply by what packets you saw come in to port 25 and
noone would have to worry you were stealing
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>
> If you just want IPs, maybe instead of running an SMTP service that 450s,
> > you would want to use a packet filter like iptables instead. You could get
> > the IPs simply by what
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(1) Mark is trying to collect data on how the remote MTA behaves when
presented with a 451 tmpfail result. A firewall rule can't do that.
From his message: "I'm not interested in the
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(1) Mark is trying to collect data on how the remote MTA behaves when
presented with a 451 tmpfail result. A firewall rule can't do that.
From his message: "I'm n
Kevin W. Gagel writes:
> - Original Message -
> >Marc Perkel wrote:
> >> Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
> >> at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
> >> and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your hi
IOn Wed, 2008-05-07 at 08:50 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
> at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
> and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your highest
> numbered fake MX recor
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 09:33 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> Kevin W. Gagel writes:
> > - Original Message -
> > >Marc Perkel wrote:
> > >> Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
> > >> at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
>
ram wrote:
IOn Wed, 2008-05-07 at 08:50 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your highest
numbered fak
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
To participate all you have to do is set your highest numbered MX to
point to:
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
Several people have asked me how I'm doing this and can they have my
code to do it themselves. My situation is unique enough that it just
won't w
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
To participate all you have to do is set your highest numbered MX to
point to:
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
Several people have asked me how I'm doing this and can they have my
code to do it themselves. My situation is unique enough
Well now, if a spambot actually does start recognizing and avoiding his system,
doesn't that mean he wins and the spammer loses?
>>> John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/08/08 12:11 PM >>>
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
> To participate all you have to do is set your highest numbered MX t
Kevin Parris wrote:
Well now, if a spambot actually does start recognizing and avoiding his system,
doesn't that mean he wins and the spammer loses?
I would say YES!
You should make an effort to clean it up so that others *can* install it as a
standalone daemon, as I suggested. Why? H
Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 8 mei 2008 19:07
To: Kevin Parris
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Experimental - use my server for your high fake MX record
Kevin Parris wrote:
Well now, if a spambot actually does start recognizing and avoiding his system,
doesn
On May 7, 2008, at 9:17 AM, mouss wrote:
what if he comes back later to the same MX, again and again (AFAIK,
this is the case with qmail)? mail will be lost.
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomn
Jo Rhett wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 9:17 AM, mouss wrote:
what if he comes back later to the same MX, again and again (AFAIK,
this is the case with qmail)? mail will be lost.
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
start by updating the RFCs.
mouss wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 9:17 AM, mouss wrote:
what if he comes back later to the same MX, again and again (AFAIK,
this is the case with qmail)? mail will be lost.
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
start by updating the RFCs.
Qmail only has a problem with lowe
Marc Perkel wrote:
mouss wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 9:17 AM, mouss wrote:
what if he comes back later to the same MX, again and again (AFAIK,
this is the case with qmail)? mail will be lost.
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
start by updating the RFCs.
Qmail only has
On May 21, 2008, at 1:44 PM, mouss wrote:
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
start by updating the RFCs.
The RFCs are, and have always been clear on how MX records are
supposed to be used.
Are you just a nonsense machine? The SA list's personal eliza run
through the borker?
--
Jo Rhet
Jo Rhett wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 9:17 AM, mouss wrote:
what if he comes back later to the same MX, again and again (AFAIK,
this is the case with qmail)? mail will be lost.
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
Agreed. Qmail should die!
Jo Rhett wrote:
On May 21, 2008, at 1:44 PM, mouss wrote:
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
start by updating the RFCs.
The RFCs are, and have always been clear on how MX records are
supposed to be used.
Different people interpret when a "delivery attempt succeeds" differently.
[Insu
Marc Perkel wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 9:17 AM, mouss wrote:
what if he comes back later to the same MX, again and again (AFAIK,
this is the case with qmail)? mail will be lost.
Good. Time for qmail to die ;-)
Agreed. Qmail should die!
Why?
R.
Marc Perkel wrote:
First to do what I'm doing you have to be using EXIM. If you aren't
running exim then you just can't do it. In fact, with all due respect, I
can't see how anyone can do spam filtering and not use exim as their MTA.
qpsmtpd is another viable alternative.
Exim has a feature
Am 2008-05-23 11:18:57, schrieb Robin Bowes:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> >First to do what I'm doing you have to be using EXIM. If you aren't
> >running exim then you just can't do it. In fact, with all due respect, I
> >can't see how anyone can do spam filtering and not use exim as their MTA.
>
>
31 matches
Mail list logo