Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-04 Thread jdow
From: Sent: Friday, 2009/December/04 06:04 On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 06:55 -0700, LuKreme wrote: On 3-Dec-2009, at 23:06, R-Elists wrote: > certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability > for > Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related rules in the default > Spa

Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-04 Thread Justin Mason
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 14:04, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 06:55 -0700, LuKreme wrote: > > On 3-Dec-2009, at 23:06, R-Elists wrote: > > > certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability > for > > > Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related r

Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-04 Thread rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 06:55 -0700, LuKreme wrote: > On 3-Dec-2009, at 23:06, R-Elists wrote: > > certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability for > > Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related rules in the default > > Spamassassin configs? > > > My position on HAB

Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-04 Thread LuKreme
On 3-Dec-2009, at 23:06, R-Elists wrote: > certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability for > Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related rules in the default > Spamassassin configs? My position on HABEAS is well-know by anyone who cares (I score it +0.5 and +2.0)

Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-04 Thread jdow
From: "LuKreme" Sent: Thursday, 2009/December/03 20:55 On Dec 3, 2009, at 13:43, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:23 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote: On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:59 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: Look, get a room. Or at least take this twisted courtship dance

RE: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-03 Thread R-Elists
> From: LuKreme > > Look, get a room. Or at least take this twisted courtship > dance offlist and spare us, please. > LuKreme, certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability for Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related rules in the default Spamassassin conf

Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-03 Thread LuKreme
On Dec 3, 2009, at 13:43, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" > wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:23 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote: On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:59 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: Look, get a room. Or at least take this twisted courtship dance offlist and spare us, please.

Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER)

2009-12-03 Thread rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:23 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote: > On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:59 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > > As for > > insulting you - grow up. You work in the business of sending unwanted > > junk email. > > You haven't done any research at all, have you? > > http://www.cauce.org/abo