Hi Charles,
Yes, it was an incorrectly escaped forward slash in a subject rule.
On 2019/06/24 16:12, Charles Amstutz wrote:
Hi Charles,
My apologies, I forgot to provide feedback to the mailing list. Bad regex was
the cause of this problem for us, too. As soon as the custom rule was fixed,
Hi Charles,
My apologies, I forgot to provide feedback to the mailing list. Bad
regex was the cause of this problem for us, too. As soon as the custom
rule was fixed, the problem went away.
Kind Regards,
Stephan
On 2019/06/24 15:58, Charles Amstutz wrote:
But as has already been pointed
> But as has already been pointed out it has the combination of
> MISSING_FROM and HK_RANDOM_FROM, and the latter is based on a
> From:addr test.
I saw this too, however, I thought I noticed a potentially bad regex (from
another custom rule) breaking mine. I think this is the case as when I
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 18:10:51 +0300
Savvas Karagiannidis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my guess is that for some reason an empty line is inserted in the
> email somewhere above the headers and before the message is processed
> by spamassassin. This will cause all headers below this empty line to
> be treated
Hi,
my guess is that for some reason an empty line is inserted in the email
somewhere above the headers and before the message is processed by
spamassassin. This will cause all headers below this empty line to be
treated as the actual body of the message, so all missing header tests
will hit
On 04.06.19 16:29, Stephan Fourie wrote:
My apologies, seems something went wrong with the formatting when it
was pasted to the pastebin. Here's a new example with spacing intact:
https://pastebin.com/raw/tQtSMQPs
In this example some of the other headers were also not 'seen'.
there's
Hi,
My apologies, seems something went wrong with the formatting when it was
pasted to the pastebin. Here's a new example with spacing intact:
https://pastebin.com/raw/tQtSMQPs
In this example some of the other headers were also not 'seen'.
Thanks!
Stephan
On 2019/06/04 10:55, Matus UHLAR
On 3 Jun 2019, at 2:20, Stephan Fourie wrote:
> We're currently seeing the rule MISSING_SUBJECT sporadically
> hitting on emails that have a subject. This issue seems to have
> started during last week, which is when clients started complaining
> about false positive detections. Please see
On Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:43:44 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 3 Jun 2019, at 2:20, Stephan Fourie wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're currently seeing the rule MISSING_SUBJECT sporadically
> > hitting on emails that have a subject. This issue seems to have
> > started during last week, which is when
On 3 Jun 2019, at 2:20, Stephan Fourie wrote:
Hi,
We're currently seeing the rule MISSING_SUBJECT sporadically hitting
on emails that have a subject. This issue seems to have started during
last week, which is when clients started complaining about false
positive detections. Please see
10 matches
Mail list logo
