On Friday 06 October 2006 06:45, Chris Santerre wrote:
IMHO I think its because most of us belive if you have to fetch the spam,
scan it localy, then you have already lost the battle by having to waste
resources to get the spam down to your machine.
What a strange attitude for someone on a
RE: On spamassassin usage, from an sa ignoramus There may be more than you
think. I do both. I've got a Big
Machine (medium volume mail server) at work and I do
Fetchmail-Maildrop-SA at home.
IMHO I think its because most of us belive if you have to fetch the spam,
scan it localy,
then you
Loren Wilton wrote:
So I started running fetchmail as a cron job from each mail server.
This seems to work fine. What puzzles me is that I never saw this
suggested anywhere.
Am I missing some obvious alternative?
Nope, this is a moderately standard way to do this.
Title: RE: On spamassassin usage, from an sa ignoramus
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 9:10 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: On spamassassin usage, from an sa ignoramus
Loren Wilton wrote
Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loren Wilton wrote:
So I started running fetchmail as a cron job from each mail
server. This seems to work fine. What puzzles me is that I
never saw this suggested anywhere. Am I missing some obvious
alternative?
On Thursday 05 October 2006 07:41, Timothy Murphy wrote:
So I started running fetchmail as a cron job from each mail server.
This seems to work fine.
What puzzles me is that I never saw this suggested anywhere.
Am I missing some obvious alternative?
I suggest you will wait several minutes in
