On 31.10.23 09:10, Linkcheck via users wrote:
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1
--max-children=5 --helper-home-dir=/var/lib/spamassassin -u
debian-spamd"
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2023-10-31 11:48:
On 31.10.23 09:10, Linkcheck via users wrote:
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1
--max-children=5 --hel
> yes, although --create-prefs is useless when you use --nouser-config
Thanks. I'll look at the docs.
On 31.10.23 09:10, Linkcheck via users wrote:
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1
--max-children=5 --helper-home-dir=/var/lib/spamassassin -u
debian-spamd"
Thanks, Vincent. I hadn't spotted that.
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1 --max-children=5
--helper-home-dir=/var/lib/spamassassin -u debian-spamd"
I assume that's ok.
On 2023-10-30 16:45:31 +, Linkcheck via users wrote:
> I have just updated Debian to Bookworm in order to install SA 4. Very few
> problems so far but the postfix log is giving:
>
> "spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set
> to root, falling back to nobody"
On 30.10.23 16:45, Linkcheck via users wrote:
I have just updated Debian to Bookworm in order to install SA 4. Very
few problems so far but the postfix log is giving:
"spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found,
or set to root, falling back to nobody"
I am not sure w
On 2023-10-30 at 12:45:31 UTC-0400 (Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:45:31 +)
Linkcheck via users
is rumored to have said:
I have just updated Debian to Bookworm in order to install SA 4. Very
few problems so far but the postfix log is giving:
"spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u,
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
bddd1...@kreme.com>
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
LuKreme wrote on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:20:49 -0600:
Since I have both local and virtual users I don't see any choice but
to run sa-learn as root.
which means you want to run a "sitewide ba
bddd1...@kreme.com>
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
LuKreme wrote on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:20:49 -0600:
> Since I have both local and virtual users I don't see any choice but
> to run sa-learn as root.
which means you want to run a "sitewide bayes". Oh, I'm repeating myself,
sorry.
Kai
On 13-Mar-2009, at 11:31, RobertH wrote:
i am guessing that he does not run SA as the vpopmail user, although
i could
be wrong.
even so, UID and GID matters when running sa-learn, and if i cannot
read the
files it is processing because they do not have the required perms or
UID/GID, then it
On 13-Mar-2009, at 11:31, RobertH wrote:
i am guessing that he does not run SA as the vpopmail user, although
i could
be wrong.
even so, UID and GID matters when running sa-learn, and if i cannot
read the
files it is processing because they do not have the required perms or
UID/GID, then it
>
> I suggested to read up on "sitewide bayes". Did you?
>
> > ls -axl /usr/local/virtual/ash...@example.com/
>
> This stuff is not of interest to SA at all. The bayes db and
> the AWL is.
> If you cannot change ownership of that directory or of the db
> files, you have to move them elsewhe
I suggested to read up on "sitewide bayes". Did you?
> ls -axl /usr/local/virtual/ash...@example.com/
This stuff is not of interest to SA at all. The bayes db and the AWL is.
If you cannot change ownership of that directory or of the db files, you
have to move them elsewhere. Cut the connection
On 11-Mar-2009, at 09:34, RobertH wrote:
ls -axl
on all those subdirectories, what do you see ?
drwx--6 vpopmail postfix512 Feb 11 2005 as...@example.com
$ ls -axl /usr/local/virtual/ash...@example.com/
total 16
drwx-- 6 vpopmail postfix 512 Feb 11 2005 .
drwxr-xr-x 9
> From: LuKreme
> Not *A* virtual mail account, *the* virtual mail account;
> that is, the account that owns /usr/local/virtual and all the
> files and directories in it.
>
LuKreme,
it appeared to me that you were setup as vpopmail UID aka *user*
in administration, as you well know, you als
> LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:49:31 -0600:
>
>> er... not sure, I installed from ports ages ago.
>
> and which SA version is it then?
>
>> /usr/local/virtual/.spamassasin and the files therein are all owned by
>> the virtual mail account.
>
> virtual mail account? How can a *virtual* mail
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:49:31 -0600:
> er... not sure, I installed from ports ages ago.
and which SA version is it then?
> /usr/local/virtual/.spamassasin and the files therein are all owned by
> the virtual mail account.
virtual mail account? How can a *virtual* mail account be
On 10-Mar-2009, at 17:24, LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Mar-2009, at 17:11, LuKreme wrote:
I moved aside the spamd.sh file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and
reinstalled SA again. No new spamd.sh was installed.
Ah.. well, it installed a startup script named sa-spamd
well, that's better at least.
Well, the
On 10-Mar-2009, at 17:11, LuKreme wrote:
I moved aside the spamd.sh file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and
reinstalled SA again. No new spamd.sh was installed.
Ah.. well, it installed a startup script named sa-spamd
well, that's better at least.
--
Mac OSX - Because making Unix user-friendly was
On 10-Mar-2009, at 16:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:58:01 -0600:
I've tried looking, but don't know what spamd should be running as.
As the user that is specified in the init script. Create a new user
named
spamd. Use a correct init script and not what you go
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:58:01 -0600:
> I've tried looking, but don't know what spamd should be running as.
As the user that is specified in the init script. Create a new user named
spamd. Use a correct init script and not what you got in
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh
Isn't there one
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:31:00 -0800
Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> how do I track down and correct the following error. I have
> spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine.
>
> Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root:
> user not specified with -u, n
Noah wrote:
> how do I track down and correct the following error. I have
> spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine.
>
> Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root:
> user not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to
> nobody
Find out where spamd i
25 matches
Mail list logo
