On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 27/04/18 16:22, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 27/04/18 10:49, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I am getting some FP's with URI_TRY_3LD hitting the url get.adobe.com in
the body of emails:
Apr 27 10:45:39.330 [32173]
On 27/04/18 16:22, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 27/04/18 10:49, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I am getting some FP's with URI_TRY_3LD hitting the url get.adobe.com
in the body of emails:
Apr 27 10:45:39.330 [32173] dbg: rules: ran uri rule URI_TRY_3LD
==>
On 27/04/18 16:19, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I am getting some FP's with URI_TRY_3LD hitting the url get.adobe.com
in the body of emails:
Apr 27 10:45:39.330 [32173] dbg: rules: ran uri rule URI_TRY_3LD
==> got hit: "http://get.adobe.com";
Would it
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 27/04/18 10:49, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I am getting some FP's with URI_TRY_3LD hitting the url get.adobe.com in
the body of emails:
Apr 27 10:45:39.330 [32173] dbg: rules: ran uri rule URI_TRY_3LD ==>
got hit: "http://get.adobe.com";
Woul
If this is causing the entire mail to be flagged as SPAM, we need to see
the entire FP not just a hit on one rule. That rule has a max 0.8 score.
Though it does appear to be hitting on more than intended though.
Anyone know what it is supposed to hit because I think it might be hitting
on a lot
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I am getting some FP's with URI_TRY_3LD hitting the url get.adobe.com in the
body of emails:
Apr 27 10:45:39.330 [32173] dbg: rules: ran uri rule URI_TRY_3LD ==> got
hit: "http://get.adobe.com";
Would it be possible to add some exception to th
On 27/04/18 10:49, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I am getting some FP's with URI_TRY_3LD hitting the url get.adobe.com in
the body of emails:
Apr 27 10:45:39.330 [32173] dbg: rules: ran uri rule URI_TRY_3LD ==>
got hit: "http://get.adobe.com";
Would it be possible to add some exception to this
