I just got information from the open suse group where I can get
3.2.3.11, I have update my spamassassin, and I am not getting those ugly
errors, but I am still getting this one, which was drive me crazy before...
2.5 FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Information
cpayne wrote:
>>
> Cool I just found a source rpm and I am building 3.2.3.10 so hopefully
> this will help my issue thanks guys.
>
> By the way, I notices no one answer the part about the script.
You mean this one:
--
If questions, anyone know of script that works
Justin Mason wrote:
cpayne writes:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Thanks, guys the problem is that for SuSE 10.0 3.1.8 is the max, and the
last time I update a 10.0 to the lastest everything broke. And the major
thing for me that perl is still at 5.8.7, don't you have to be 5.8.8 or
higher for the laste
cpayne writes:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> Thanks, guys the problem is that for SuSE 10.0 3.1.8 is the max, and the
> last time I update a 10.0 to the lastest everything broke. And the major
> thing for me that perl is still at 5.8.7, don't you have to be 5.8.8 or
> higher for the lastest stuff.
nope
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:52:41PM -0400, cpayne wrote:
> but I have found out that
> sa-update places the lastest greatest updates in /var/lib/spamassasin
> and suse by default places the test files into /usr/share/spamassassin I
> think that is the problem. So know I have to figure out how to kil
Matt Kettler wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
3.18 is unsupported.
please update to latest versions.
Well, it's as supported or unsupported as any other version of
SpamAssassin is. No version of SpamAssassin is "supported" by the SA
team beyond the advice given on this list. (sure, s
> I am also running an old version (3.1.7 on Ubuntu 7.04). Between SA and
> Thunderbird's own spam features, I am detecting something between 75%
> and 80% of spam. How much better is 3.2.x?
On my small system (5 users) spam detection is above 99% accuracy for my
own mail account. Less than 1
On 16.10.07 10:46, Kent Borg wrote:
> I am also running an old version (3.1.7 on Ubuntu 7.04). Between SA and
> Thunderbird's own spam features, I am detecting something between 75%
> and 80% of spam. How much better is 3.2.x?
It contains more actual and some new rules. but I can't tell you "how
007 15:46
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin
>
> I am also running an old version (3.1.7 on Ubuntu 7.04). Between SA and
> Thunderbird's own spam features, I am detecting something between 75%
> and 80% of spam.
I am also running an old version (3.1.7 on Ubuntu 7.04). Between SA and
Thunderbird's own spam features, I am detecting something between 75%
and 80% of spam. How much better is 3.2.x?
Thanks,
-kb
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> 3.18 is unsupported.
> please update to latest versions.
>
>
Well, it's as supported or unsupported as any other version of
SpamAssassin is. No version of SpamAssassin is "supported" by the SA
team beyond the advice given on this list. (sure, some third parties
offer
3.18 is unsupported.
please update to latest versions.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Office: 561-999-5000 x 1259
Direct: 561-939-7259
Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news
_
This email has been scanned and c
12 matches
Mail list logo
