On 25-Mar-2009, at 09:38, Dave Pooser wrote:
Is there a blacklist_noauth? Because it seems that would be far more
useful for paypal.
blacklist_auth *paypal*
You whitelist_auth paypal.com and then a rule that scores +50 for From
contains *...@paypal.com -- quick and easy.
well, of course man
> Is there a blacklist_noauth? Because it seems that would be far more
> useful for paypal.
>
> blacklist_auth *paypal*
You whitelist_auth paypal.com and then a rule that scores +50 for From
contains *...@paypal.com -- quick and easy.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
"There a
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:19 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 24-Mar-2009, at 19:54, RW wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:35:53 +0100 (CET)
> > "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
> >> On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
> Is there a blacklist_noauth? Because it seems that would be far more
> useful for
On 24-Mar-2009, at 19:54, RW wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:35:53 +0100 (CET)
"Benny Pedersen" wrote:
On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
whitelist_from *...@whitelist3.com
forged senders welcome :)
hope *_from will be removed in next sa, its the badest check in
current sa of all tes
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:35:53 +0100 (CET)
"Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>
> On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
>
> > whitelist_from *...@whitelist3.com
>
> forged senders welcome :)
>
> hope *_from will be removed in next sa, its the badest check in
> current sa of all tests :/
>
> change
On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
> blacklist_from *...@blacklist1.com
> blacklist_from *...@blacklist2.com
> blacklist_from *...@blacklist3.com
> required_score 100
> whitelist_from *...@whitelist1.com
> whitelist_from *...@whitelist2.com
> whitelist_from *...@whitelist3.com
forged se
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:30:23 +0100
On 23.03.09 21:58, dsh979 wrote:
> I did not realise that items listed on the white list or the black list
> would still be subject to the operation/analysis of the SpamAssassin
Rules.
all rules are pro
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, dsh979 wrote:
Q:How can I list items/users on a "white list" or a "black list" without
the lists (and items) being the subject of further analysis by the
SpamAssassin Rules
That has to be done outside SA. Basically (modulo shortcuts, which you
shouldn't be playing with)
On 23.03.09 21:58, dsh979 wrote:
> I did not realise that items listed on the white list or the black list
> would still be subject to the operation/analysis of the SpamAssassin Rules.
all rules are processed unless you play with ShortCircuit plugin. Beware of
that: It may render the SA useless
On Mon, March 23, 2009 10:58 pm, dsh979 wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply Matt.
>
> I did not realise that items listed on the white list or the black list
> would still be subject to the operation/analysis of the SpamAssassin
> Rules.
>
> You have asked why I have set the required score the 100
Thank you for your reply Matt.
I did not realise that items listed on the white list or the black list
would still be subject to the operation/analysis of the SpamAssassin Rules.
You have asked why I have set the required score the 100. Lengthy
explanation (sorry). I have done this to preven
> Thanks for your reply. I am adding users to the white list and the black
> list (in the SpamAssassin user preferences file) as follows:
> whitelist_from *...@whitelist1.com
whitelist_from should be used as a last resort; whitelist_from_auth and
whitelist_from_rcvd are significantly safer in
dsh979 wrote:
> Hello John
>
> Thanks for your reply. I am adding users to the white list and the black
> list (in the SpamAssassin user preferences file) as follows:
>
> blacklist_from *...@blacklist1.com
> blacklist_from *...@blacklist2.com
> blacklist_from *...@blacklist3.com
> required_score 1
Hello John
Thanks for your reply. I am adding users to the white list and the black
list (in the SpamAssassin user preferences file) as follows:
blacklist_from *...@blacklist1.com
blacklist_from *...@blacklist2.com
blacklist_from *...@blacklist3.com
required_score 100
whitelist_from *...@whitel
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, dsh979 wrote:
I have found that when I add manually a user to the whitelist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get inconsistent results:
...
I have also found that when I manually a user to the blacklist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get the foll
15 matches
Mail list logo
