One of my users just started getting slammed. This one user, out of 400+
is getting a dictionary attack that's overwhelming all my spamd process
slots.
Doing this on the spamd side would make simply stopping this really simple
-- even programmatically (i.e. automatically). Manually, even wit
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> > Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> >> I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring)
> >> for a specific user.
>
> See my previous message. I don't see an easy macro in procmail for the
> current effective UID, nor do
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:11:11PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> > At the moment, that's a hack in the system-wide procmailrc that I don't
> > know how to do, since the only thing procmail knows about userspace is
> > "dropprivs="yes"", a
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> I'm running procmail with dropprivs=yes. There's no easy procmail thing
> for (getpwnam($<)) and I do NOT feel like firing up perl on every message
> to evaluate that just to figure out if I should fire up the C program
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
As an aside, part of this is why I had asked for (a while back) a way to
specify the "domain" portion of the -u argument, i.e. so it could be done
per-calling server (i.e. it is assumed that if shell server A and shell
server B, each with a distinct
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:11:11PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
At the moment, that's a hack in the system-wide procmailrc that I don't
know how to do, since the only thing procmail knows about userspace is
"dropprivs="yes"", and there's no
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Coffey, Neal wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring)
for a specific user.
This needs to be done in whatever you're using to call SpamAssassin
(postfix, exim, sendmail, etc).
This shouldn't be a difficult
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:11:11PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> At the moment, that's a hack in the system-wide procmailrc that I don't
> know how to do, since the only thing procmail knows about userspace is
> "dropprivs="yes"", and there's no translation for an easy way to equate
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:59:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring) for a
specific user.
Don't send mails for that user to SA.
At the moment, that's a hack in the system-wid
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring)
> for a specific user.
This needs to be done in whatever you're using to call SpamAssassin
(postfix, exim, sendmail, etc).
> This shouldn't be a difficult feature to implement at all -- I'd
> ima
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:59:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring) for a
> specific user.
Don't send mails for that user to SA.
> what I want instead is some special way that SA will say "nope, not even
> testing" and
11 matches
Mail list logo