Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-21 Thread Loren Wilton
> Theo Van Dinter writes: >> > > I don't believe anything was changed about this. The 3.1 code, for instance, > > still looks for 50 chars: > > > > while ( ($k,$v) = each %{$conf->{tests}} ) { > > if ($conf->{lint_rules}) { > > if (length($k) > 50 && $k !~ /^__/ && $k !~ /^T_/) { > >

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:49:36AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > > warn "config: warning: rule name '$k' is over 50 chars\n"; > > 3.1 no longer complains about descriptions over (what was it?) 70 chars -- > it does complain about overlong rule names, but descriptions have a much > higher li

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-21 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:09:24PM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote: > > Theo, I thought the warning on rule name length and description > > length had either been eliminated to drastically lengthened for > > non-English rules. Or

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:09:24PM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote: > Theo, I thought the warning on rule name length and description length had > either been eliminated to drastically lengthened for non-English rules. Or > was this only in the 3.1 stream? I know there was work done on this > somewh

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jim Knuth wrote on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:05:10 +0200: > sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is > (see attachment warning.txt) Got the same when I reviewed a 3.0.1 installation from rpm on CentOS with German environment the other day. I simply removed the rpm installatio

Upgrading SA 2.64 - 3.0.3/4

2005-06-21 Thread Richard Whelan
Hi, I'm currently trying to move from a pair of machines running MD 2.43 & SA 2.64 to a pair of much faster systems running MD 2.52 & SA 3.0.4. I'd like to use my existing bayes and awl DBs as these have been built up over quite some time. I've tried using the db-to-tx

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Loren Wilton
Theo, I thought the warning on rule name length and description length had either been eliminated to drastically lengthened for non-English rules. Or was this only in the 3.1 stream? I know there was work done on this somewhere. Loren

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 06:05:10AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: > sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is > (see attachment warning.txt) The warnings are all covered by my previous message. The description over 50 chars warning is known and apparently unavoidable for German.

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Jim Knuth
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo, Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 05:28 Uhr) schriebst Du: > lang de describe T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T Senderechner in IADB-Liste > (www.isipp.com) sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is (see attachment warning.txt) -- Viele Grüße, Kind regards

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Jim Knuth
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo, Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 05:28 Uhr) schriebst Du: > Aha. So there are three things here. First, I misread the warning. > Second, you are running with a locale for Germany, so you get the rule > descriptions from 30_text_de.cf. Third, the rule translations have a

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:59:30AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: > >> warning: description exists for non-existent rule T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T > > Mmh. wget from > http://www.apache.de/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz > I`ts no development. Aha. So there are three things here. F

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Jim Knuth
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo, Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 04:33 Uhr) schriebst Du: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:41:41AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: >> I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new >> 2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes: >> >> warn

Re: Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:41:41AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: > I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new > 2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes: > > warning: description exists for non-existent rule T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T Hrm. You seem to have some deve

Problems after update SA 2.64 => 3.0.4

2005-06-20 Thread Jim Knuth
Hallo und guten Morgen List, I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new 2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes: --snip warning: description for HTML_SHOUTING4 is over 50 chars warning: description for CLICK_TO_REMOVE_1 is over 50 chars warning: description for

Re: ****SPAM(8.1)**** Problems with new spam getting through in SA 2.64 the last few days

2005-02-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
Score from 3.0.0 without any custom rules: Content analysis details: (12.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- 2.2 TO_MALFORMED To: has a malformed address 0.0 BAYES_50 BO

Problems with new spam getting through in SA 2.64 the last few days

2005-02-21 Thread Frank Tore Johansen
These are the rules I have: 31854 jun 1 2004 70_sare_adult.cf 3927 apr 24 2004 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf 85658 jan 28 07:23 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf 70561 jan 28 07:23 70_sare_genlsubj1.cf 107315 feb 12 23:35 70_sare_header0.cf 75276 feb 12 23:35 70_sare_header1.cf 32960 sep 13 02:23

Re: SA 2.64

2004-10-15 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:46 PM 10/15/2004, Mario Sergio Candian wrote: If i send a spam mail with the string in the message body without any subject: GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UBE-TEST-EMAIL of my account to the server with SA, will i receive an email marked SPAM? Yes, you it should tag it. You can even include whatever su

Re: SA 2.64

2004-10-14 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:11 PM 10/14/2004, Mario Sergio Candian wrote: when i run spamassassin --lint -D, SA get these directorys: debug: using "/usr/local/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir debug: using "/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir debug: using "/root/.spamassassin" for user state dir

Re: SA 2.64

2004-10-14 Thread Mario Sergio Candian
1 of 1 queries debug: running meta tests; score so far=1.27 debug: is spam? score=1.27 required=3.7 tests=DATE_MISSING,NO_REAL_NAME is SA read the .cf files in the /usr/local/share/spamassassin first? Mario Sergio On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 02:16 PM 10/14/2004, Mario Sergio

Re: SA 2.64

2004-10-14 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:06 PM 10/14/2004, Mario Sergio Candian wrote: Oks, Thanks Matt. But, you tell me to run spamassassin --lint -D to make sure SA is using /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin as the "site rules" directory, if the SA doenst using the .cf files of this directory, how i can do to the SA read the .cf i

Re: SA 2.64

2004-10-14 Thread Mario Sergio Candian
ption that it must be passed in the command line? Mario Sergio On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 02:16 PM 10/14/2004, Mario Sergio Candian wrote: > >i installed the SA 2.64 with qmail, vpopmail, qmail-scanner, etc... I have > >one question. I have three files in /usr/l

Re: SA 2.64

2004-10-14 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:16 PM 10/14/2004, Mario Sergio Candian wrote: i installed the SA 2.64 with qmail, vpopmail, qmail-scanner, etc... I have one question. I have three files in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassasin (local.cf, br_rules.cf and relatorio_msg.cf). I need SA read the local.cf and the others files br_rules

SA 2.64

2004-10-14 Thread Mario Sergio Candian
Hi guys, i installed the SA 2.64 with qmail, vpopmail, qmail-scanner, etc... I have one question. I have three files in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassasin (local.cf, br_rules.cf and relatorio_msg.cf). I need SA read the local.cf and the others files br_rules and relatorio_msg.cf. How i can do it