Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-10-01 Thread Doug Brott
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote: OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that d

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:44:20AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > > if the init.pre is never read from what you specify as --siteconfigpath, > > that's a bug -- could you report it to the bugzilla?(however I'm > > pretty ce

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:44:20AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > if the init.pre is never read from what you specify as --siteconfigpath, > that's a bug -- could you report it to the bugzilla?(however I'm > pretty certain we have a test for that so that sounds odd.) I think the issue is that in

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote: > > >OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I > > >don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard > > >directo

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote: > >OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I > >don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard > >directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that > >directory (wher

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Maurice Lucas
OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that directory (where my local.cf file and my own custom rules files are located). For some r

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Christopher Jett
I forgot to mention that the only thing unusual about my local.cf file is that it rewrites the Subject header differently than the standard installed local.cf file. This same problem is also repeatable with either spamassassin, or spamc/spamd when using the --siteconfigpath directive. -- Chris

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Christopher Jett
OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that directory (where my local.cf file and my own custom rules files are located). For some r

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-30 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 4:58:21 PM, Christopher Jett wrote: > Still not seeing any hits from SURBL. I do see hits from other RBL's. [...] > Tons of spam like this, but no SURBL hits at all. I just verified that > my Net::DNS is up to date as well. I am at a loss to figure out why >

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-29 Thread Christopher Jett
On Sep 28, 2004, at 3:18 AM, John Andersen wrote: On Monday 27 September 2004 09:22 pm, Christopher Jett wrote: Just upgraded to 3.0 from 2.6.3. I don't see where SURBL is ever registering a score, where previously it was scoring tons of mail. How can I verify that it is actually working? I ins

Re: SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-28 Thread John Andersen
On Monday 27 September 2004 09:22 pm, Christopher Jett wrote: > Just upgraded to 3.0 from 2.6.3. I don't see where SURBL is ever > registering a score, where previously it was scoring tons of mail. How > can I verify that it is actually working? I installed it using MCPAN > and --lint shows ever

SURBL in 3.0

2004-09-28 Thread Christopher Jett
Just upgraded to 3.0 from 2.6.3. I don't see where SURBL is ever registering a score, where previously it was scoring tons of mail. How can I verify that it is actually working? I installed it using MCPAN and --lint shows everything A-OK. -- Chris Jett [EMAIL PROTECTED]