Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I
don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard
directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that
d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:44:20AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> > if the init.pre is never read from what you specify as --siteconfigpath,
> > that's a bug -- could you report it to the bugzilla?(however I'm
> > pretty ce
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:44:20AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> if the init.pre is never read from what you specify as --siteconfigpath,
> that's a bug -- could you report it to the bugzilla?(however I'm
> pretty certain we have a test for that so that sounds odd.)
I think the issue is that in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> > >OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I
> > >don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard
> > >directo
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> >OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I
> >don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard
> >directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that
> >directory (wher
OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I
don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard
directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that
directory (where my local.cf file and my own custom rules files are
located). For some r
I forgot to mention that the only thing unusual about my local.cf file
is that it rewrites the Subject header differently than the standard
installed local.cf file. This same problem is also repeatable with
either spamassassin, or spamc/spamd when using the --siteconfigpath
directive.
--
Chris
OK - I think I have narrowed down what is happening with this, though I
don't know why. I have placed my local.cf file in a non-standard
directory and I am using the --siteconfigpath=path to point to that
directory (where my local.cf file and my own custom rules files are
located). For some r
On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 4:58:21 PM, Christopher Jett wrote:
> Still not seeing any hits from SURBL. I do see hits from other RBL's.
[...]
> Tons of spam like this, but no SURBL hits at all. I just verified that
> my Net::DNS is up to date as well. I am at a loss to figure out why
>
On Sep 28, 2004, at 3:18 AM, John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 27 September 2004 09:22 pm, Christopher Jett wrote:
Just upgraded to 3.0 from 2.6.3. I don't see where SURBL is ever
registering a score, where previously it was scoring tons of mail.
How
can I verify that it is actually working? I ins
On Monday 27 September 2004 09:22 pm, Christopher Jett wrote:
> Just upgraded to 3.0 from 2.6.3. I don't see where SURBL is ever
> registering a score, where previously it was scoring tons of mail. How
> can I verify that it is actually working? I installed it using MCPAN
> and --lint shows ever
Just upgraded to 3.0 from 2.6.3. I don't see where SURBL is ever
registering a score, where previously it was scoring tons of mail. How
can I verify that it is actually working? I installed it using MCPAN
and --lint shows everything A-OK.
--
Chris Jett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo