Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:10:49AM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: >> >Now, I can presume to delete any earlier v3xx.pre files I guess. >> >> No. > >More specifically, the other pre files load other plugins. You can never > just assume to delete c

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:10:49AM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > >Now, I can presume to delete any earlier v3xx.pre files I guess. > No. More specifically, the other pre files load other plugins. You can never just assume to delete config files unless you fully know that they're not being us

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-21 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Frovarp wrote: Gene Heskett wrote: Also, how about /etc/mail/spamassassin/RuleDuJour? Can that copy of all this go away also? It is not being mentioned in the --lint -D report output. That was just a staging area for RDJ and never used by s

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Frovarp wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> Also, how about /etc/mail/spamassassin/RuleDuJour? Can that copy of all >> this go away also? It is not being mentioned in the --lint -D report >> output. > >That was just a staging area for RDJ and never used by spamassassin.

RE: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Skip Brott
Steven Stern wrote: > Did you import his key with sa-update --import his.key.file.here Yes and I found my problem. I missed the last line where I also had to include the --gpgkey option. I had been thinking that the --import option took care of it, but is required both.

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Steven Stern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Skip Brott wrote: > Using the recommended actions from this list, I run this: > > sa-update --channelfile > /etc/mail/spamassassin/saupdate/sare-sa-update-channels.txt -D > > I get this result from each channel: > > [29610] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Richard Frovarp
Gene Heskett wrote: Also, how about /etc/mail/spamassassin/RuleDuJour? Can that copy of all this go away also? It is not being mentioned in the --lint -D report output. That was just a staging area for RDJ and never used by spamassassin. Updates were downloaded there first and then linted

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Frovarp wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Frovarp wrote: >>> Skip Brott wrote: I ran with the --nogpg option and was able to get all the files to download. Yay! But do I really want to run it that way? And on that no

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Richard Frovarp
Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Frovarp wrote: Skip Brott wrote: I ran with the --nogpg option and was able to get all the files to download. Yay! But do I really want to run it that way? And on that note, how does SA know where to find the .cf files in /var/lib/s

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Frovarp wrote: >Skip Brott wrote: >> I ran with the --nogpg option and was able to get all the files to >> download. Yay! But do I really want to run it that way? >> >> And on that note, how does SA know where to find the .cf files in >> /var/lib/spamassassin? Doe

Re: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Richard Frovarp
Skip Brott wrote: I ran with the --nogpg option and was able to get all the files to download. Yay! But do I really want to run it that way? And on that note, how does SA know where to find the .cf files in /var/lib/spamassassin? Does it see subfolders and load the .cf files from there? O

RE: Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Skip Brott
I ran with the --nogpg option and was able to get all the files to download. Yay! But do I really want to run it that way? And on that note, how does SA know where to find the .cf files in /var/lib/spamassassin? Does it see subfolders and load the .cf files from there? Or do those downloaded u

Sa-update question

2007-07-20 Thread Skip Brott
Using the recommended actions from this list, I run this: sa-update --channelfile /etc/mail/spamassassin/saupdate/sare-sa-update-channels.txt -D I get this result from each channel: [29610] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature made Mon 04 Jun 2007 08:14:08 PM CDT using DSA key ID 856AA88A [29610] dbg: gpg:

Re: sa-update question

2007-04-12 Thread DAve
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Kurt Buff wrote: From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea: Kurt Buff wrote: 3) Lastly, what is this line all about?: Can't locate object method "finish" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginH andler.pm line 187.

RE: sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Kurt Buff
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 1) My install of FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't have /var/lib, let along > > /var/lib/spamassassin, so I used an --updatedir of > > /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-updates, which seems to > work. Is this > > reasonable, or will it conflict with anyth

REW: sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Kurt Buff
Nuts. Didn't send this to the list. Sorry. Kurt From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea: > Kurt Buff wrote: > > > 3) Lastly, what is this line all about?: > > Can't locate object method "finish" via package > > "Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at > > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Pl

Re: sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Kurt Buff wrote: From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea: Kurt Buff wrote: 3) Lastly, what is this line all about?: Can't locate object method "finish" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginH andler.pm line 187. I'm running SA 3.1.8. IIR

Re: sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:58:58AM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > New installation on FreeBSD 6.2, ran 'sa-update -D', got the following > output, which I've snipped to highlight the questions I have: > > 1) I've added this from ports with pkg_add: > [11431] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident

Re: sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Kurt Buff wrote: 3) Lastly, what is this line all about?: Can't locate object method "finish" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm line 187. I'm running SA 3.1.8. IIRC old versions of the FuzzyOCR plugin cause thi

RE: sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Kurt Buff
> -Original Message- > From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:08 > To: Kurt Buff > Cc: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' > Subject: Re: sa-update question > > > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 09:58 -0700, Kur

Re: sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 09:58 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > New installation on FreeBSD 6.2, ran 'sa-update -D', got the following > output, which I've snipped to highlight the questions I have: > > 1) I've added this from ports with pkg_add: > [11431] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident ('requi

sa-update question

2007-04-11 Thread Kurt Buff
New installation on FreeBSD 6.2, ran 'sa-update -D', got the following output, which I've snipped to highlight the questions I have: 1) I've added this from ports with pkg_add: [11431] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident ('require' failed) 2) I'm assuming that I'll have to add this via CP

Re: sa-update question, kinda

2006-11-29 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:39:10AM -0500, Joe Zitnik wrote: > I know you can use sa-update to download the new sa-rules as they become > available. Are the rules located somewhere that they can be manually > downloaded as they are updated, kind of like rulesemporium? I was > poking around the sa

Re: sa-update question, kinda

2006-11-29 Thread Matt Kettler
Joe Zitnik wrote: > I know you can use sa-update to download the new sa-rules as they become > available. Are the rules located somewhere that they can be manually > downloaded as they are updated, kind of like rulesemporium? I was > poking around the sa site, but couldn't find updated rules, onl

sa-update question, kinda

2006-11-29 Thread Joe Zitnik
I know you can use sa-update to download the new sa-rules as they become available. Are the rules located somewhere that they can be manually downloaded as they are updated, kind of like rulesemporium? I was poking around the sa site, but couldn't find updated rules, only full releases.

RE: sa-update question

2006-07-05 Thread Jerry Bell
> You don't need to include the directory. SA will automatically use it > if it exists. Run SA in debug mode to see which directory it uses. > > spamassassin -D config --lint Looks like I need to have a little more faith in the developers :) Thanks! Jerry

RE: sa-update question

2006-07-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Jerry Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 12:40 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: sa-update question > > I'm running 3.1.3 on a FreeBSD server. I just found out > about sa-update

RE: sa-update question

2006-07-05 Thread Bowie Bailey
Jerry Bell wrote: > I'm running 3.1.3 on a FreeBSD server. I just found out about > sa-update which looks like a great tool. My question is this: how > can I take advantage of the updated configs? The problem that I see > is that Freebsd uses completely non standard directories for > everything

sa-update question

2006-07-05 Thread Jerry Bell
I'm running 3.1.3 on a FreeBSD server. I just found out about sa-update which looks like a great tool. My question is this: how can I take advantage of the updated configs? The problem that I see is that Freebsd uses completely non standard directories for everything, so I don't have much confi

Re: dumb sa-update question

2006-06-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:37:04PM -0400, Ben Lentz wrote: > >The easiest method is to put the report_contact setting in your local.cf, > >then > >you don't have to care what sa-update does. :) > Wow, a reply from the man himself! Hehe. :) > "I don't know, but we should probably do something."

Re: dumb sa-update question

2006-06-09 Thread Ben Lentz
- Original Message - *From:* Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *Sent:* 06/09/2006 12:27:22 PM *To:* users@spamassassin.apache.org *Subject:* dumb sa-update question On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:13:49PM -0400, Ben Lentz wrote: When I run sa-update and download the new

Re: dumb sa-update question

2006-06-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:13:49PM -0400, Ben Lentz wrote: > When I run sa-update and download the new set of include-d rules, it > seems the system doesn't define a few make-style variables that /do/ get > defined when installing from CPAN. I guess the most obvious one is the Yes. This is a k

dumb sa-update question

2006-06-09 Thread Ben Lentz
Greetings List, When I run sa-update and download the new set of include-d rules, it seems the system doesn't define a few make-style variables that /do/ get defined when installing from CPAN. I guess the most obvious one is the report_contact @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ in 10_misc.cf. To fix this, sho