Re: Single word mails .

2007-04-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Steven W. Orr wrote: > On Thursday, Apr 26th 2007 at 01:45 -0400, quoth Matt Kettler: > > =>ram wrote: > =>> Are the spammers testing some new spamtool > =>> I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc > =>> > =>> what is this about now ? > =>> > =>Read the archives

Re: Single word mails .

2007-04-26 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Thursday, Apr 26th 2007 at 01:45 -0400, quoth Matt Kettler: =>ram wrote: =>> Are the spammers testing some new spamtool =>> I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc =>> =>> what is this about now ? =>> =>Read the archives for more details, however the general

Re: Single word mails .

2007-04-26 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi Tim, > Is there a good test for these? I don't get many of them, probably because I block them at MTA via zen.spamhaus.org. But the ones that do get through are caught nicely by the BOTNET rules. Chau, Andy. -- If it ain't broke, improve it.

Re: Single word mails .

2007-04-26 Thread Tim B.
Matt Kettler wrote: ram wrote: Are the spammers testing some new spamtool I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc what is this about now ? Read the archives for more details, however the general consensus is it's due to: 1) a mass run of short-email

Re: Single word mails .

2007-04-25 Thread Matt Kettler
ram wrote: > Are the spammers testing some new spamtool > I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc > > what is this about now ? > Read the archives for more details, however the general consensus is it's due to: 1) a mass run of short-emails to a broader-range o

Single word mails .

2007-04-25 Thread ram
Are the spammers testing some new spamtool I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc what is this about now ? Thanks Ram