On 24-Mar-2009, at 19:54, RW wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:35:53 +0100 (CET)
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
whitelist_from *...@whitelist3.com
forged senders welcome :)
hope *_from will be removed in next sa, its the badest check in
current
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:19 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 24-Mar-2009, at 19:54, RW wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:35:53 +0100 (CET)
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
Is there a blacklist_noauth? Because it seems that would be far more
useful
Is there a blacklist_noauth? Because it seems that would be far more
useful for paypal.
blacklist_auth *paypal*
You whitelist_auth paypal.com and then a rule that scores +50 for From
contains *...@paypal.com -- quick and easy.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
There are
On 25-Mar-2009, at 09:38, Dave Pooser wrote:
Is there a blacklist_noauth? Because it seems that would be far more
useful for paypal.
blacklist_auth *paypal*
You whitelist_auth paypal.com and then a rule that scores +50 for From
contains *...@paypal.com -- quick and easy.
well, of course
On 23.03.09 21:58, dsh979 wrote:
I did not realise that items listed on the white list or the black list
would still be subject to the operation/analysis of the SpamAssassin Rules.
all rules are processed unless you play with ShortCircuit plugin. Beware of
that: It may render the SA useless
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, dsh979 wrote:
Q:How can I list items/users on a white list or a black list without
the lists (and items) being the subject of further analysis by the
SpamAssassin Rules
That has to be done outside SA. Basically (modulo shortcuts, which you
shouldn't be playing with) SA
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:30:23 +0100
On 23.03.09 21:58, dsh979 wrote:
I did not realise that items listed on the white list or the black list
would still be subject to the operation/analysis of the SpamAssassin
Rules.
On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
blacklist_from *...@blacklist1.com
blacklist_from *...@blacklist2.com
blacklist_from *...@blacklist3.com
required_score 100
whitelist_from *...@whitelist1.com
whitelist_from *...@whitelist2.com
whitelist_from *...@whitelist3.com
forged senders
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:35:53 +0100 (CET)
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Tue, March 24, 2009 03:34, dsh979 wrote:
whitelist_from *...@whitelist3.com
forged senders welcome :)
hope *_from will be removed in next sa, its the badest check in
current sa of all tests :/
change
---
1327 days until the Presidential Election
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spam-Assassin-White-List-tp22589650p22673278.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
dsh979 wrote:
Hello John
Thanks for your reply. I am adding users to the white list and the black
list (in the SpamAssassin user preferences file) as follows:
blacklist_from *...@blacklist1.com
blacklist_from *...@blacklist2.com
blacklist_from *...@blacklist3.com
required_score 100
Thanks for your reply. I am adding users to the white list and the black
list (in the SpamAssassin user preferences file) as follows:
snip
whitelist_from *...@whitelist1.com
whitelist_from should be used as a last resort; whitelist_from_auth and
whitelist_from_rcvd are significantly safer
.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spam-Assassin-White-List-tp22589650p22674314.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
blacklists from working 100% of the time.
The blacklist works by adding +100 to the message score, but if the
other rules it matches come out negative, the blacklist won't be
effective because the total score will be under 100.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spam-Assassin
://www.nabble.com/Spam-Assassin-White-List-tp22589650p22589650.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, dsh979 wrote:
I have found that when I add manually a user to the whitelist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get inconsistent results:
...
I have also found that when I manually a user to the blacklist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get the
16 matches
Mail list logo