On 31.10.23 09:10, Linkcheck via users wrote:
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1
--max-children=5 --helper-home-dir=/var/lib/spamassassin -u
debian-spamd"
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2023-10-31 11:48:
On 31.10.23 09:10, Linkcheck via users wrote:
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1
--max-children=5 --hel
> yes, although --create-prefs is useless when you use --nouser-config
Thanks. I'll look at the docs.
On 31.10.23 09:10, Linkcheck via users wrote:
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1
--max-children=5 --helper-home-dir=/var/lib/spamassassin -u
debian-spamd"
Thanks, Vincent. I hadn't spotted that.
Thanks, Matus. So nice when these little changes creep up on you. :)
I have merged the new OPTIONS with my old one...
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --nouser-config -4 -i 127.0.0.1 --max-children=5
--helper-home-dir=/var/lib/spamassassin -u debian-spamd"
I assume that's ok.
On 2023-10-30 16:45:31 +, Linkcheck via users wrote:
> I have just updated Debian to Bookworm in order to install SA 4. Very few
> problems so far but the postfix log is giving:
>
> "spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set
> to root, fa
On 30.10.23 16:45, Linkcheck via users wrote:
I have just updated Debian to Bookworm in order to install SA 4. Very
few problems so far but the postfix log is giving:
"spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found,
or set to root, falling back to nobody"
I a
On 2023-10-30 at 12:45:31 UTC-0400 (Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:45:31 +)
Linkcheck via users
is rumored to have said:
I have just updated Debian to Bookworm in order to install SA 4. Very
few problems so far but the postfix log is giving:
"spamd: still running as root: user not specified wi
I have just updated Debian to Bookworm in order to install SA 4. Very
few problems so far but the postfix log is giving:
"spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or
set to root, falling back to nobody"
I am not sure where to specify an appropriate
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
bddd1...@kreme.com>
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
LuKreme wrote on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:20:49 -0600:
Since I have both local and virtual users I don't see any choice but
to run sa-learn as root.
which means you want to run a "sitewide ba
bddd1...@kreme.com>
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
LuKreme wrote on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:20:49 -0600:
> Since I have both local and virtual users I don't see any choice but
> to run sa-learn as root.
which means you want to run a "sitewide bayes". Oh, I'm repeating myself,
sorry.
Kai
On 13-Mar-2009, at 11:31, RobertH wrote:
i am guessing that he does not run SA as the vpopmail user, although
i could
be wrong.
even so, UID and GID matters when running sa-learn, and if i cannot
read the
files it is processing because they do not have the required perms or
UID/GID, then it
On 13-Mar-2009, at 11:31, RobertH wrote:
i am guessing that he does not run SA as the vpopmail user, although
i could
be wrong.
even so, UID and GID matters when running sa-learn, and if i cannot
read the
files it is processing because they do not have the required perms or
UID/GID, then it
>
> I suggested to read up on "sitewide bayes". Did you?
>
> > ls -axl /usr/local/virtual/ash...@example.com/
>
> This stuff is not of interest to SA at all. The bayes db and
> the AWL is.
> If you cannot change ownership of that directory or of the db
> files, you have to move them elsewhe
I suggested to read up on "sitewide bayes". Did you?
> ls -axl /usr/local/virtual/ash...@example.com/
This stuff is not of interest to SA at all. The bayes db and the AWL is.
If you cannot change ownership of that directory or of the db files, you
have to move them elsewhere. Cut the connection
On 11-Mar-2009, at 09:34, RobertH wrote:
ls -axl
on all those subdirectories, what do you see ?
drwx--6 vpopmail postfix512 Feb 11 2005 as...@example.com
$ ls -axl /usr/local/virtual/ash...@example.com/
total 16
drwx-- 6 vpopmail postfix 512 Feb 11 2005 .
drwxr-xr-x 9
> From: LuKreme
> Not *A* virtual mail account, *the* virtual mail account;
> that is, the account that owns /usr/local/virtual and all the
> files and directories in it.
>
LuKreme,
it appeared to me that you were setup as vpopmail UID aka *user*
in administration, as you well know, you als
> LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:49:31 -0600:
>
>> er... not sure, I installed from ports ages ago.
>
> and which SA version is it then?
>
>> /usr/local/virtual/.spamassasin and the files therein are all owned by
>> the virtual mail account.
>
> virtual mail account? How can a *virtual* mail
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:49:31 -0600:
> er... not sure, I installed from ports ages ago.
and which SA version is it then?
> /usr/local/virtual/.spamassasin and the files therein are all owned by
> the virtual mail account.
virtual mail account? How can a *virtual* mail account be
On 10-Mar-2009, at 17:24, LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Mar-2009, at 17:11, LuKreme wrote:
I moved aside the spamd.sh file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and
reinstalled SA again. No new spamd.sh was installed.
Ah.. well, it installed a startup script named sa-spamd
well, that's better at least.
Well, the
On 10-Mar-2009, at 17:11, LuKreme wrote:
I moved aside the spamd.sh file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and
reinstalled SA again. No new spamd.sh was installed.
Ah.. well, it installed a startup script named sa-spamd
well, that's better at least.
--
Mac OSX - Because making Unix user-friendly was
On 10-Mar-2009, at 16:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:58:01 -0600:
I've tried looking, but don't know what spamd should be running as.
As the user that is specified in the init script. Create a new user
named
spamd. Use a correct init script and not what you go
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:58:01 -0600:
> I've tried looking, but don't know what spamd should be running as.
As the user that is specified in the init script. Create a new user named
spamd. Use a correct init script and not what you got in
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh
Isn't there one
What should I do about "still running as root" messages?
Mar 10 14:44:30 mail spamd[290]: spamd: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 62538
Mar 10 14:44:30 mail spamd[290]: spamd: setuid to root succeeded
Mar 10 14:44:30 mail spamd[290]: spamd: still running as root:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:31:00 -0800
Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> how do I track down and correct the following error. I have
> spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine.
>
> Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root:
&
Noah wrote:
> how do I track down and correct the following error. I have
> spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine.
>
> Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root:
> user not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to
> nobody
Fi
Hi there,
how do I track down and correct the following error. I have
spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine.
Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root: user
not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody
# pkg_info | grep Spam
p5
Dan Mahoney, System Admin prime.gushi.org> writes:
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, John Fleming wrote:
>
> It's in the manual. Add the following line to your system wide procmail
> file:
>
> DROPPRIVS=YES
>
> -Dan
>
That was it. Problem solved. Thanks for the tip.
I looked on the wiki and in
eeded
spamd[15901]: Still running as root: user not specified with -u, not
found,
or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
I get this if I call spamc from /etc/procmailrc. However, if I call from
individual users' .procmailrc files, it runs as that user, and stats
(sa-stats.pl) generated from the ma
> > another machine. Everything installs fine (make tests=100%) and seem to
> run
> > but in /var/log/maillog, I get these entries:
> >
> > info: setuid to root succeeded
> > spamd[15901]: Still running as root: user not specified with -u, not
> found,
> >
Which version of SA? This sounds like a problem in some of the earlier cuts
at 3.0.
Loren
> another machine. Everything installs fine (make tests=100%) and seem to
run
> but in /var/log/maillog, I get these entries:
>
> info: setuid to root succeeded
> spamd[15901]: S
Hi.
I've been running SA for awhile now and recently tried to install it on
another machine. Everything installs fine (make tests=100%) and seem to run
but in /var/log/maillog, I get these entries:
info: setuid to root succeeded
spamd[15901]: Still running as root: user not specified wi
33 matches
Mail list logo
