> But the reality of the numbers won't stop the FTC from tooting it's own
> horn and claiming victory.. Unfortunately for us, this will likely result
> in some major spammers unleashing a mass-scale deluge just to show they're
> wrong. The best I think we can hope for is that a few of them might ge
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 03:00 PM 12/21/2005, Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
> But the reality of the numbers won't stop the FTC from tooting it's own
> horn and claiming victory.. Unfortunately for us, this will likel
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 07:13 PM 12/21/2005, jdow wrote:
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4547474.stm
Not according to my statsbut the users don't get the spam anymore ;-)
It's the BBC, for crying out loud. They've wipe
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:28:26AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Sounds to me like they're claiming CAN-SPAM is a victory... They aren't
> claiming final victory yet, but they are claiming CAN-SPAM is providing
> consumer protection by acting as a deterrent and enforcement tool. This is
> true,
At 07:13 PM 12/21/2005, jdow wrote:
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4547474.stm
Not according to my statsbut the users don't get the spam anymore ;-)
It's the BBC, for crying out loud. They've wiped their own reputation
with so many dirty c
At 03:00 PM 12/21/2005, Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
> But the reality of the numbers won't stop the FTC from tooting it's own
> horn and claiming victory.. Unfortunately for us, this will likely result
> in some major spammers unleashin
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4547474.stm
Not according to my statsbut the users don't get the spam anymore ;-)
It's the BBC, for crying out loud. They've wiped their own reputation
with so many dirty cloths they've used it all up. I nev
--On Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:39 PM -0500 Matt Kettler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps a better term is "selective greylisting"
I'm Using milter-greylists's acls. My default is to whitelist (ie: not
greylist) but I have an extensive set of ACLs that use regexes to
greylist most dialup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
> But the reality of the numbers won't stop the FTC from tooting it's own
> horn and claiming victory.. Unfortunately for us, this will likely result
> in some major spammers unleashing a mass-scale deluge just to show they're
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:42:18AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>>My tagged spam rate at the end of January 2005 (2.8k spam/day) was higher than
>>my peak rate in the past month (2.3k spam/day), but I suspect this is largely
>>due to the greylist.
>
>
> Dumb question... how
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:42:18AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> My tagged spam rate at the end of January 2005 (2.8k spam/day) was higher than
> my peak rate in the past month (2.3k spam/day), but I suspect this is largely
> due to the greylist.
Dumb question... how does one do 'partial greylistin
Stephen Sloan wrote:
> The SPAM levels hitting my servers has NEVER been higher.
That's not inconsistent with the MX Logic data. While you can't draw any
conclusions about it being a "new record high", you also can't draw any
conclusions it's not. You can also say November 2005 clearly above the
But the reality of the numbers won't stop the FTC from tooting it's own
horn and claiming victory.. Unfortunately for us, this will likely result
in some major spammers unleashing a mass-scale deluge just to show they're
wrong. The best I think we can hope for is that a few of them might get
re
OTECTED]>
To: "'SpamAssassin'"
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: US winning war on spam ?!?!?!
At 04:14 AM 12/21/2005, Martin Hepworth wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4547474.stm
Not according to my statsbut the users don&#x
At 04:14 AM 12/21/2005, Martin Hepworth wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4547474.stm
Not according to my statsbut the users don't get the spam anymore ;-)
I find it amusing that most of the stats in that article are the combined
affects of spam filters and the can-spam law, b
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4547474.stm
Not according to my statsbut the users don't get the spam anymore ;-)
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
**
This emai
16 matches
Mail list logo
