On 12/06/2016 21:14, Bill Cole wrote:
but can you explain why the world needs yet another new mail server
implementation?
As an example of why I ask this, consider that Microsoft rewrote the
SMTP implementation in Exchange 2013 and did it wrong,
A question and answer all in one. I like
On 12/06/2016 21:14, Bill Cole wrote:
I was not at all confused, but sometimes when people are Wrong On The
Internet in special ways I cannot resist the urge to respond with a
paraphrased geek meme...
Look up Jamie Zawinski's famous "2 problems" quote regarding regular
expressions. It is
Am 09.06.2016 um 13:55 schrieb jimimaseye:
Once upon a time the include rules for spamassassin was published in its wiki
(example here: http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html) which in
turn gave a link to an 'explanation' detail of the individual rules.
However, as you know, these
On 11 Jun 2016, at 4:21, Groach wrote:
On 11/06/2016 05:09, Bill Cole wrote:
So, you thought validating email addresses was a problem demanding a
solution? And you "solved" it with a regular expression?
Congratulations on now having 2 problems. They should be very happy
together.
The
On 11/06/2016 05:09, Bill Cole wrote:
So, you thought validating email addresses was a problem demanding a
solution? And you "solved" it with a regular expression?
Congratulations on now having 2 problems. They should be very happy
together.
The regex I quoted was out of context to the
On 10 Jun 2016, at 3:09, jimimaseye wrote:
REGEXP: I dont mind having a go at reading them (I have written some
myself) but, as you know, even though some are easy and obvious
sometimes it
can be like reading music - a blur of blobs, dots and squiggles that
take a
lot of deciphering. Of
d]{1,4}\]|(?=.{1,255}$)((?!-|\.|\d+($|\.))[a-zA-Z\d-]{0,62}[a-zA-Z\d])(|\.(?!-|\.|\d+($|\.))[a-zA-Z\d-]{0,62}[a-zA-Z\d]){1,126})$
Very proud of it too. )
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Where-to-find-DETAIL-for-spamassassin-default-RULES-tp121218p121250.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 6/9/2016 7:55 AM, jimimaseye wrote:
Once upon a time the include rules for spamassassin was published in its wiki
(example here: http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html) which in
turn gave a link to an 'explanation' detail of the individual rules.
However, as you know, these wiki
the first place).
TIA
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Where-to-find-DETAIL-for-spamassassin-default-RULES-tp121218.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have a bookmark in Firefox that point
is message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Where-to-find-DETAIL-for-spamassassin-default-RULES-tp121218.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo
