There's a 0day exploit circulating..
Unless you block activeX objects via some other means, your Outlook*
users are vulnerable to this.
http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/19738.html
Seems like testing for "DirectAnimation.PathControl" would be a good
idea.. Any thought
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:21:47PM -0700, Ken A wrote:
> Unless you block activeX objects via some other means, your Outlook*
> users are vulnerable to this.
> http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/19738.html
>
> Seems like testing for "DirectAnimation.PathControl" would be
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Ken A wrote:
> Seems like testing for "DirectAnimation.PathControl" would be a good
> idea.. Any thoughts on this?
>
> full LOCAL_09152006_0_DAY/DirectAnimation.PathControl/i
> describe LOCAL_09152006_0_DAY DirectAnimation.PathControl object code
> score LOCAL_0915200
On Fri, September 15, 2006 4:34 pm, John D. Hardin said:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Ken A wrote:
>
>> Seems like testing for "DirectAnimation.PathControl" would be a good
>> idea.. Any thoughts on this?
>>
>> full LOCAL_09152006_0_DAY/DirectAnimation.PathControl/i
>> describe LOCAL_09152006_0_DAY
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Fri, September 15, 2006 4:34 pm, John D. Hardin said:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Ken A wrote:
Seems like testing for "DirectAnimation.PathControl" would be a good
idea.. Any thoughts on this?
fullLOCAL_09152006_0_DAY/DirectAnimation.PathControl/i
describe LOCAL_0