Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-12 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:31:19AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > It might be more common, but it's very surprising to me, because the > manual page documents that () works Let's face it, lot of the stuff in SA including documentation is probably over decade old. And documentation is always the

Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-12 Thread Greg Troxel
Henrik K writes: > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 07:12:35AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Henrik K writes: >> >> > From what I've seen, it's very uncommon to use this format. Why rely on >> > some vague previously defined score, which can change at any time? Just >> > set >> > a static score you

Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-12 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 07:12:35AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > Henrik K writes: > > > From what I've seen, it's very uncommon to use this format. Why rely on > > some vague previously defined score, which can change at any time? Just set > > a static score you like and fits your system. > >

Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-12 Thread Greg Troxel
Henrik K writes: > From what I've seen, it's very uncommon to use this format. Why rely on > some vague previously defined score, which can change at any time? Just set > a static score you like and fits your system. It's not vague; it's the score which is defined by the distributed rules.

Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-11 Thread Henrik K
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:21:20AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > But is it good practice for the main distributed rules to rely on this > default? It feels like a lint/pedantic error to define a rule that is > not T_ or __ and does not have an assigned score. But maybe this is > common and

Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-11 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Try something like this if I understand you correctly trying to score is a __ rule: meta OBFU_UNSUB_UL ( __OBFU_UNSUB_UL >=1 ) There are plenty of rules that are designed to be conditions in other meta rules. Now that you've created a rule that relies on that condition you can score the meta

Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-11 Thread Greg Troxel
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > On 11.05.23 10:58, Greg Troxel wrote: >>I am seeing a lot of "claim your prize from X", where X is a known >>company, coming from fresh foo.autos domains. I bet y'all are seeing >>this too. Until these get on blocklists they don't score that high. >> >>One rule

Re: mystery score definition

2023-05-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11.05.23 10:58, Greg Troxel wrote: I am seeing a lot of "claim your prize from X", where X is a known company, coming from fresh foo.autos domains. I bet y'all are seeing this too. Until these get on blocklists they don't score that high. One rule that does hit is OBFU_UNSUB_UL which is

mystery score definition

2023-05-11 Thread Greg Troxel
I am seeing a lot of "claim your prize from X", where X is a known company, coming from fresh foo.autos domains. I bet y'all are seeing this too. Until these get on blocklists they don't score that high. One rule that does hit is OBFU_UNSUB_UL which is defined in 72_active.cf as meta, and