> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:48:52 +0100
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > can IP addresses in PBL get onto XBL?
On 10.11.10 08:46, RW wrote:
> Yes, some servers reject on XBL, but not on PBL.
I was more interested iun spamhaus practice.
And not rejecting mail from PBL at SMTP level is imho strang
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:48:52 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On 05.11.10 12:28, RW wrote:
> > > > It's not all that safe to deep-parse XBL because it's mostly
> > > > dynamically assigned IP addresses.
>
> > On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:38:45 +0100
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > the
> > On 05.11.10 12:28, RW wrote:
> > > It's not all that safe to deep-parse XBL because it's mostly
> > > dynamically assigned IP addresses.
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:38:45 +0100
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > the PBL from ZEN is mostly dynamically assigned.
> > the XBL means exploits block li
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:38:45 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:54:08 +
> > Ned Slider wrote:
> > > are safe to do so. You should be safe to deep parse against
> > > Spamhaus SBL and XBL but not PBL. This instance hits against XBL
> > > and many others.
>
> On 05.
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:54:08 +
> Ned Slider wrote:
> > are safe to do so. You should be safe to deep parse against Spamhaus
> > SBL and XBL but not PBL. This instance hits against XBL and many
> > others.
On 05.11.10 12:28, RW wrote:
> It's not all that safe to deep-parse XBL because it's m
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:54:08 +
Ned Slider wrote:
> are safe to do so. You should be safe to deep parse against Spamhaus
> SBL and XBL but not PBL. This instance hits against XBL and many
> others.
It's not all that safe to deep-parse XBL because it's mostly
dynamically assigned IP addresse
On 05/11/10 07:02, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
Hello,
I have a lot of mail like this one: http://tengu.pastebin.com/PCyGxApn
The problem is, SA doesn't seem to see it as a spam (I've included all
headers).
I'm willing to create a filter for those nasty mails, but I have to
confess I'm not really s
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 09:02 +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
> It seems that a patern like /[a-z]+~[a-z]+~[a-z]+/i is used in each
> mail - I have to dig in my spambox to confirm that.
>
> Maybe I can use the return-path, from and X-Originating-Email in
> addition ?
>
If they all contain:
- a
Hello,
I have a lot of mail like this one: http://tengu.pastebin.com/PCyGxApn
The problem is, SA doesn't seem to see it as a spam (I've included all
headers).
I'm willing to create a filter for those nasty mails, but I have to
confess I'm not really sure on how to do it.
It seems that a pa
LuKreme wrote:
> On 17-Mar-2009, at 10:12, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > If you do not want to allow user rules, you
> > can define the rule in local.cf and give it a 0 score. The
> > individual users would then be able to activate the rule by
> > changing the score in user_prefs.
>
>
> Oh? Well, tha
On 17-Mar-2009, at 10:12, Bowie Bailey wrote:
If you do not want to allow user rules, you
can define the rule in local.cf and give it a 0 score. The individual
users would then be able to activate the rule by changing the score in
user_prefs.
Oh? Well, that's clever. I thought scoring 0 dis
I did not realize you were talking about whitelisting when I replied.
The whitelist_from and related commands use filename globbing. You can
use '?' to represent one character or '*' to represent any number of
characters, but that is the extent of it.
The rule that I listed below can be used as a
LuKreme wrote:
On 13-Mar-2009, at 12:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
I get many emails addressed to internal sendmail 's.
123...@mydomain or 1abd56.ef7...@mydomain
(seem to fit a basic pattern but don't know how to specify the
pattern (or I don't have it right):
<(start of an email-address)>[0-9][
On 13-Mar-2009, at 12:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
I get many emails addressed to internal sendmail 's.
123...@mydomain
1abd56.ef7...@mydomain
(seem to fit a basic pattern but don't know how to specify the
pattern (or I don't have it right):
<(start of an email-address)>[0-9][0-9a-fa-f\@mydomain
Does the below apply to the
~/.spamassassin/userprefs
whitelisting (command, keyword or feature)...
Sorry...it was the whitelisting in the userpref file that I
was talking about the "primitive pattern matching"
At one point it was limited to DOS-like file-matching patterns,
not the
Linda Walsh wrote:
> I get many emails addressed to internal sendmail 's.
> 123...@mydomain
> 1abd56.ef7...@mydomain
>
>
> (seem to fit a basic pattern but don't know how to specify the
> pattern (or I don't have it right):
> <(start of an email-address)>[0-9][0-9a-fa-f\@mydomain
>
> b
I get many emails addressed to internal sendmail 's.
123...@mydomain
1abd56.ef7...@mydomain
(seem to fit a basic pattern but don't know how to specify the
pattern (or I don't have it right):
<(start of an email-address)>[0-9][0-9a-fa-f\@mydomain
by start of an email, addr, I mean inside
17 matches
Mail list logo
