Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-07 Thread Matt Kettler
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] dos]$ grep " CF_URLS\[" rules_du_jour | grep -v > RULESEMPORIUM > > CF_URLS[7]="http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf"; > > > antidrug.cf isn't being updated ever again and it's not for use with > SA 3.x or later (which excludes it's

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-07 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Alan Munday wrote: Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 17:31: Is a migration document really necessary? Stop using the rule files you got via RDJ that you now want to get with sa-update. Start using sa-update for those rule files. Have some lunch. Agreed - I do like to l

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-06 Thread Alan Munday
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 17:31: This isn't aimed at you in particular, but why does it seem that a really large number of people assume that sa-update isn't going to work correctly, or well, by default? Is it their past experience with the quality of SpamAssassin

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-06 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Alan Munday wrote: Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 00:31: Advantage over sa-update? Other than the issue with 3.1.6 (only), there shouldn't be any issues with how sa-update lints rules. This is not obvious as there is no mention of linting in the docs http://spamassas

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-06 Thread Alan Munday
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 00:31: Advantage over sa-update? Other than the issue with 3.1.6 (only), there shouldn't be any issues with how sa-update lints rules. This is not obvious as there is no mention of linting in the docs http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Alan Munday wrote: By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the stock rules. However, there have been additional channels created for sa-update to allow it to update the SARE rules as well. You just add the ones you want to your sa-update channels file. One advantage

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread Alan Munday
By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the stock rules. However, there have been additional channels created for sa-update to allow it to update the SARE rules as well. You just add the ones you want to your sa-update channels file. One advantage RDJ seems to have is

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread René Berber
Bowie Bailey wrote: > René Berber wrote: [snip] >> Are you sure? >> >> I'm using both and I don't see any duplication of score hits. For >> instance, what is the SA equivalent to 70_sare_stocks.cf? > > By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the stock > rules. However, t

RE: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread Bowie Bailey
René Berber wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > Bazooka Joe wrote: > > > Thx Bowie > > > > > > That fixed rdj. > > > > > > But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj? > > > > Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still > > using RDJ for rule updates, so I can't help yo

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread René Berber
Bowie Bailey wrote: > Bazooka Joe wrote: >> Thx Bowie >> >> That fixed rdj. >> >> But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj? > > Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still using RDJ > for rule updates, so I can't help you with the channel configuration. Are you sure?

RE: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread Bowie Bailey
Bazooka Joe wrote: > Thx Bowie > > That fixed rdj. > > But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj? Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still using RDJ for rule updates, so I can't help you with the channel configuration. -- Bowie

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread Bazooka Joe
Thx Bowie That fixed rdj. But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj? -bazooka On 12/5/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bazooka Joe wrote: > rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out > now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced > rule

RE: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-05 Thread Bowie Bailey
Bazooka Joe wrote: > rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out > now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced > rules_du_jour? Should I be using something else to update my sare > rules? > > thx > > -bazooka > > ps I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.4 > > pps b

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-04 Thread Bazooka Joe
I think so. ran spamassassin --lint and no errors. On 12/4/06, Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bazooka Joe wrote: > rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out > now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced > rules_du_jour? Should I be using somethi

Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?

2006-12-04 Thread Steven Stern
Bazooka Joe wrote: > rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out > now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced > rules_du_jour? Should I be using something else to update my sare > rules? > > thx > > -bazooka > > ps I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.4 > > pps b