On Friday 14 July 2017 at 15:29:38, Charles Amstutz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I keep having spam come through that hits on almost zero rules, (or very
> few) . I get this is definitely possibly, but it's annoying as its
> obviously spam. I guess my question is, if what we have in place isn't
>
Hello,
I keep having spam come through that hits on almost zero rules, (or very few) .
I get this is definitely possibly, but it's annoying as its obviously spam. I
guess my question is, if what we have in place isn't hitting on much, then
aside from learning it to Bayes, what do we do? Even
I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but when
simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay server
and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
Am 06.01.2014 16:02, schrieb Mark Chaney:
I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but when
simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay server
and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a way
to discard high scoring spam (lets
On 06.01.14 09:02, Mark Chaney wrote:
I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but
when simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay
server and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there
still a way to discard high scoring spam (lets say
, is there still a way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this would work with amavis
or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it standalone with postfix/SA. I
am hoping to avoid having to create filters at the destination servers
high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this would work with
amavis
or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it standalone with postfix/SA.
I
am hoping to avoid having to create filters at the destination servers
and having them deleted
anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this would work with amavis
or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it standalone with postfix/SA. I
am hoping to avoid having
anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this would work with amavis
or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it standalone with postfix/SA. I
am hoping to avoid
Chaney:
I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but when
simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay server
and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
on searching for this answer, but
when
simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay server
and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a
way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how
on searching for this answer, but
when
simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay
server
and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a
way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how
, is there
still a way to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still
marking emails with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this
would work with amavis or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it
standalone with postfix/SA. I am hoping to avoid having to create
filters at the destination servers
Mark Chaney wrote:
I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but
when simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay
server and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there
still a way to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still
high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still
marking emails with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this would
work with amavis or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it standalone
with postfix/SA. I am hoping to avoid having to create filters at the
destination servers and having them deleted
SpamAssassin can not drop a mail - it will always produce its output and not
producing it is treated as an error.
If you call SpamAssassin directly from within Postfix, you can use a
header check to discard the message on a high score.
Yeah, I'm surprised how many people answered no to this
On 04/22/2013 09:29 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
Are you ready/willing to report spam you receive to spamcop.net, razor,
pyzor, ...?
On 22.04.13 15:01, Thomas Cameron wrote:
That's an interesting question...
Each user has their own spam folders, so I guess I should create a
cron job per user
On 04/08/2013 03:52 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
[...]
I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
the X-Spam-Level header. But since it uses
On 22.04.13 08:27, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Currently I'm using procmail recipes for individual users, but I'm
leaning heavily towards going back to spamass-milter, and rejecting
everything that scores 10 or more.
with thing like spamass-milter I found REFUSING mail (not devnulling!)
sa safe. I
On 04/22/2013 03:27 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
On 04/08/2013 03:52 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
[...]
I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
Andrzej A. Filip skrev den 2013-04-22 16:29:
Are you ready/willing to report spam you receive to spamcop.net,
razor,
pyzor, ...?
or dnswl, return-path ? :)
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
On 04/22/2013 09:03 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.04.13 08:27, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Currently I'm using procmail recipes for individual users, but I'm
leaning heavily towards going back to spamass-milter, and rejecting
everything that scores 10 or more.
with thing like
On 04/22/2013 09:29 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
False positives in super-spam (10 SA score) should be very rare.
Exactly my point.
Are you ready/willing to report spam you receive to spamcop.net, razor,
pyzor, ...?
That's an interesting question...
Each user has their own spam folders, so
On 2013/04/22 06:27, Thomas Cameron wrote:
On 04/08/2013 03:52 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
[...]
I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
the
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 19:41 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:02:27 -0600
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of
extended Regular Expressions, there are still quite some
differences
On Monday, April 08, 2013 05:06:57 PM Walter Hurry wrote:
I agree that dev-nulling is generally a bad idea, but there may be
exceptions.
For example, I dump everything from hinet.net straight onto the floor.
FWIW, I get ham from hinet.net.
IMHO, it is not appropriate to drop mail no matter
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Bob Proulx wrote:
Thomas Cameron wrote:
I believe that would match ... and redirect the e-mail to /dev/null. Am
I right?
I would'nt comment on the exact procmail syntax. I have lots of procmail
rules but wrote them long ago and my memory is getting rusty. I would
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
[...]
I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
the X-Spam-Level header. But since it uses asterisks, which are
interpreted as regex wildcards,
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:52:11 +0200, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
I would suggest redirecting such messages to another folder/maildir.
The folder should auto-purge old messages (e.g. older than 30 days).
Shit does happen. I remember at least one case in which mailing list
(ham) thread about spammer
hinet.net straight onto the floor.
By default, I just tag and deliver everything. For some of the company
accounts that have spam problems and for the customers who have asked
for it, I will drop high-scoring spam.
--
Bowie
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 21:44 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
[ Bunch of good advise snipped. ]
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
devnull/
Since procmail uses Extended Regular Expressions there is one more
optimization I would make. I wouldn't list out every star. It gets
hard to
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*{10}
Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of extended
Regular Expressions, there are still quite some differences to other
regex engines, like egrep's or PCRE. Most notably, the repetition
operator {n}
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:02:27 -0600
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of
extended Regular Expressions, there are still quite some
differences to other regex engines,
I got sufficiently fed up with procmail
All -
I have a pretty simple .procmailrc setup for my home mail server. Right
now it looks like:
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
* 256000
| spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag:.*YES
spam
That dumps everything that is flagged as spam into my spam folder.
I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though.
Thomas Cameron wrote:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level:.*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
I believe that would match 10 asterisks or more, and redirect the
e-mail to /dev/null. Am I right?
Mostly all okay. However I don't like the .* in the front of
it. That isn't likely to cause trouble but it is
On 04/07/2013 10:44 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Thomas Cameron wrote:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level:.*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
I believe that would match 10 asterisks or more, and redirect the
e-mail to /dev/null. Am I right?
Mostly all okay. However I don't like the .* in the front of
it. That
Makes you wonder how many servers actually accept these messages these
days!!!
Jan 31 13:46:56 gate sendmail[28364]: p0VCkkxF028364[1]: Milter add:
header: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=70.8 required=5.0
Am 31.01.2011 14:33, schrieb Giles Coochey:
Makes you wonder how many servers actually accept these messages these
days!!!
all spam traps?
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
clamav does have some kind og javascript decopding engine.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
It's plain spam - personally I don't want clamav to deal with spam.
clamav does have some
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
clamav does have some kind og javascript decopding
Christian Brel wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
clamav does have some kind og
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:15:41 +0100
Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Christian Brel wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
IT's the kind of
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Christian Brel wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
I'm just interested in the kind of java-script(?) munging that
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:56:09 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Christian Brel wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Christian Brel wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
I'm just interested in the kind of
I'm just interested in the kind of java-script(?) munging that has
gone on there and what it is in 'English' for want of a better
phrase.
Nothing was munged, it's just random text.
If so, what's the point to it?
By no means a JS coder, and haven't dug deeper to find out, but couldn't
it be
On Tue 12 Jan 2010 07:48:23 AM CET, Christian Brel wrote
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
X-Virus-Status: Infected (Sanesecurity.Junk.25057.UNOFFICIAL)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Jason Bertoch wrote:
By no means a JS coder, and haven't dug deeper to find out, but couldn't
it be pre-compiled JS and not just random text?
Doubtful. I don't believe JavaScript has a bytecode or any other (except
in some JavaScript engines internal representation) compiled format.
Francis
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
I'm just interested in the kind of java-script(?) munging that has
gone on there and what it is in 'English' for want of a better
phrase.
Nothing was munged, it's just random text.
If so, what's the point to it?
By no means a JS
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:41:00 +0100
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Tue 12 Jan 2010 07:48:23 AM CET, Christian Brel wrote
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
X-Virus-Status: Infected (Sanesecurity.Junk.25057.UNOFFICIAL)
Err, yes - I had already *highlighted* that, it was posted because
Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
Yeah, I saw a couple of those last week.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--On Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:43 AM +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
a...@onet.eu wrote:
What I would like to see is a option to make spam assassin to produce
weighted scores based on subset of all tests capable to work on subset
of the final data available *before* message headersbody are
Kenneth Porter sh...@sewingwitch.com wrote:
--On Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:43 AM +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
a...@onet.eu wrote:
What I would like to see is a option to make spam assassin to produce
weighted scores based on subset of all tests capable to work on subset
of the final data
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
At RCPT TO: stage there are available:
* connecting client IP address (last mail hop)
so big part of DNSBL and DNSWL tests *CAN* be used
* envelope sender for SPF based tests
* envelope sender and envelope recipient for auto white/black listing
(producing some
James Wilkinson sa-u...@aprilcottage.co.uk wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
At RCPT TO: stage there are available:
* connecting client IP address (last mail hop)
so big part of DNSBL and DNSWL tests *CAN* be used
* envelope sender for SPF based tests
* envelope sender and envelope
--On Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:31 PM +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
a...@onet.eu wrote:
I try hard to preach that SA methodology of creating spam score based
on weighted tests *CAN* be applied at this point too.
I would like too apply such test in milter (MIMEDefang) that uses SA
anyway in my
throwing this out there for people to chew on and think about.
Oh, and another problem with this:
About 98-99% of my spam in-stream scores as high, that any such proposal
results in a useless increase of the score.
The problem lies with the LOW scoring spam. Alas, these do not tend
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:02 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
About 98-99% of my spam in-stream scores as high, that any such proposal
results in a useless increase of the score.
The problem lies with the LOW scoring spam. Alas, these do
.
The problem lies with the LOW scoring spam. Alas, these do not tend to
trigger on a solid subset or meta as you proposed. In particular, RBL
hits are quite rare, even more so for multiple hits. The few rules hit
by low scorers are quite diverse, which complicates this.
May be spamassassin should
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
This would be an entirely different application, not SA, wouldn't it?
It can be developed using the same spam score logic, based subset of
all tests requiring only the subset of final data available during
classic run.
So in other words
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
This would be an entirely different application, not SA, wouldn't it?
It can be developed using the same spam score logic, based subset of
all tests requiring only the subset of final data available during
At 07:02 04-03-2009, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
May be spamassassin should create set of tests intended for use before
replying RCPT TO: in SMTP session?
[ test based on: sending IP address, envelope sender, envelope
recipient, and name in helo/ehlo ]
SpamAssassin processes the message and
--On Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:02 PM +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
a...@onet.eu wrote:
May be spamassassin should create set of tests intended for use before
replying RCPT TO: in SMTP session?
Check out http://mimedefang.org/
MIMEDefang includes SA integration.
Kenneth Porter sh...@sewingwitch.com wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:02 PM +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
a...@onet.eu wrote:
May be spamassassin should create set of tests intended for use before
replying RCPT TO: in SMTP session?
Check out http://mimedefang.org/
MIMEDefang includes
On 17.07.07 10:40, Anthony Kamau wrote:
I'm faced with a dilemma on how to use sa-learn with mail forwarded from
a user's inbox on Exchange to the sendmail server. Since we just
recently started using sendmail as a front end server, our bayes system
is still in its infancy and spam is getting
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 July 2007 2:51 PM
To: Anthony Kamau; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: OT Alert: Forward low scoring SPAM to sa-learn.
Only hope it to create shared, public folders for them to move
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:35 AM
To: Anthony Kamau
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: OT Alert: Forward low scoring SPAM to sa-learn.
That said, if you're just doing a forward as attachment type
Hello all.
I'm faced with a dilemma on how to use sa-learn with mail forwarded from
a user's inbox on Exchange to the sendmail server. Since we just
recently started using sendmail as a front end server, our bayes system
is still in its infancy and spam is getting through to user inboxes with
Anthony Kamau wrote:
Hello all.
I'm faced with a dilemma on how to use sa-learn with mail forwarded from
a user's inbox on Exchange to the sendmail server. Since we just
recently started using sendmail as a front end server, our bayes system
is still in its infancy and spam is getting
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Kamau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 8:40 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: OT Alert: Forward low scoring SPAM to sa-learn.
Hello all.
The next step is what has me stunned - is there a standard
marker
I am trying to understand scoring for spam messages in the
rules. I hope you guys can help me understand this better. I have
an email header below that is from a spam email. I think I follow that
the score for the various rules is in the X-Spam-Report section of the
header. I am running
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I am trying to figure out how I can get scores to this type of spam
bumped up so they do not get delivered to my user mailboxes. Can
anyone give me some suggestions on what I should do to stop this type
of spam from being delivered?
[...]
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Status:
Peter Lemieux wrote:
You don't need to bump up the score; this one received an 8.3 which
exceeds your 5.0 ceiling. This result is that it's tagged as spam. SA
itself doesn't do anything other than tag likely spams. It's up to you
to decide what to do with these messages.
[...]
I was
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I was trying to see if there was anything I could change in the rules in
spamassassin to raise the spam score up enough to reach the spam_hits=10
limit set up in my qmail controls so that qmail will not deliver the
message. Once the spam score reaches 10 delivery is
Peter Lemioux wrote:
You can modify the scoring of any rule by adding a file to
/etc/mail/spamassassin that changes the score for specific rules. I
named mine ZZscores.cf so it will be read after the other files in this
directory. For instance,
score HTML_MESSAGE_BODY1.0
R Lists06 wrote:
I am sorry if I am asking this question and it is answered in the
archives. I will try to go back and read those past posts but is
there a site where I can download the SARE stock rules and the
plugins? I am aware of Rules Du Jour but whenever I have attempted
to
Steve Ingraham wrote:
Could you explain how I can train Bayes? What specifically do I need to
do to accomplish this?
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
If you are having problems with memory after downloading the rules,
you just need to be careful that you use the right ones. Read the
descriptions of the rules carefully and only use the ones that you
think would be useful. Any time you add more rules, the spamd
children will take up more
local.cf (global spam settings)
===
required_hits 100
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [DEFINITE_SPAM]
user_prefs
===
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 0
The idea here is that all user's handle their own spam settings but the
global
Daniel W wrote:
I'm looking to be able to do a system such as follows:
local.cf (global spam settings)
===
required_hits 100
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [DEFINITE_SPAM]
body ANG_KILL_RULE_FALSE_VIRUS_SCANNER /\+\+\+ Attachment: No Virus found/
describe
From: Daniel W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel W wrote:
I'm looking to be able to do a system such as follows:
local.cf (global spam settings)
===
required_hits 100
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [DEFINITE_SPAM]
body
From: Daniel W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel W wrote:
I'm looking to be able to do a system such as follows:
local.cf (global spam settings)
===
required_hits 100
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [DEFINITE_SPAM]
body ANG_KILL_RULE_FALSE_VIRUS_SCANNER /\+\+\+ Attachment:
I'm looking to be able to do a system such as follows:
local.cf (global spam settings)
===
required_hits 100
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [DEFINITE_SPAM]
body ANG_KILL_RULE_FALSE_VIRUS_SCANNER /\+\+\+ Attachment: No Virus found/
describe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
At 11:59 AM 2/24/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamd is aliases to spamassassin.
Ok... May I ask why?
(I excluded the rest of the headers for privacy reasons, but its just the top
part of a regular email
, February 24, 2005 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
At 11:59 AM 2/24/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamd is aliases to spamassassin.
Ok... May I ask why?
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
Thanks
Robert
From your logs.
debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 48 ham(s) in
Message-
From: Ken Goods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 5:43 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
Thanks
Robert
From your logs.
debug: bayes
PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
Thanks
Robert
From your logs
Without seeing the actual spam it is hard to say how high it could score.
However, getting enough ham into Bayes such that it will run will up the
score considerably.
Loren
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
It isn't.
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do
I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 48 ham(s) in Bayes DB 200
Make sure
Robert Bartlett wrote:
Ok Im sorry I mis understood. I ran it the way you suggested and it did come
with headers this time. I attached the results. I still feel like something
else is wrong.
Install Razor.
Now that I got bayes working my next question is should I reactivate
autowhitelist and autolearn?
Thanks
Robert
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
At 10:31 AM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Do you suggest until resolved disable this? If to disable it what exactly
do
I need to disable?
Upon closer inspection are you
Hello Robert,
Not directly related to your problem, I don't think, but from your
debug listing I see you're using the following rules files:
debug: config: read file ...
debug: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_random.cf
...
debug: config: read file
At 08:06 PM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Well all I did was run spamd -D /path/to/message
Is that a typo of spamc, or did you really try to feed a message to spamd?
At 08:06 PM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Well all I did was run spamd -D /path/to/message
Wait.. even if it is a typo, it still won't work.
You need to redirect things when calling spamc.. You can't pass it a filename.
And spamc doesn't take a -D parameter, only spamd does... but spamd does
spamd is aliases to spamassassin. I forgot to insert the part in my
email but that is what I did.
Robert
At 08:06 PM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Well all I did was run spamd -D /path/to/message
Wait.. even if it is a typo, it still won't work.
You need to redirect things when
At 11:59 AM 2/24/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamd is aliases to spamassassin.
Ok... May I ask why?
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
