good link:
http://www.owlriver.com/spam/stop-spam.html
-Original Message-
From: Daniel McDonald []
Sent: Tuesday 07, December 12, 2010 16:46
To: spamassassin
Subject: Re: spam with different "Received" and "To" headers
On 12/7/10 8:20 AM, "Florescu, Dan Ale
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Florescu, Dan Alexandru wrote:
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.company.com (Postfix) with
ESMTP id 8BCA320EC86 for ;
To:
My question is: shouldn't there be a rule to verify that the mail
specified at "To:" header actually corresponds to the one at "
On 12/7/10 8:20 AM, "Florescu, Dan Alexandru"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the last few days some spam messages have been able to elude the filters I
> use. Upon checking the headers, it seems to be following the same pattern.
>
> I just earned $31 in a few hours at home on the computer! I went to -
On 2010/12/07 9:20 AM, Florescu, Dan Alexandru wrote:
My question is: shouldn't there be a rule to verify that the mail specified at "To:" header
actually corresponds to the one at "Received: [...] for<>"?
No, take this list for example. RCPT TO: will be your address, while
To: is us...@spam
Hi,
In the last few days some spam messages have been able to elude the filters I
use. Upon checking the headers, it seems to be following the same pattern.
Left only a few headers to exemplify:
-
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.company.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8BC
