On 2010/12/07 9:20 AM, Florescu, Dan Alexandru wrote:
My question is: shouldn't there be a rule to verify that the mail specified at "To:" header 
actually corresponds to the one at "Received: [...] for<>"?

No, take this list for example. RCPT TO: will be your address, while To: is [email protected].

I am using /SpamAssassin version 3.2.3

3.2.3 is over 3 years old. We're on 3.3.1, you should really consider upgrading.

--
/Jason

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to