Guten Tag Smith, Mitchell,
am Montag, 20. Mai 2013 um 17:14 schrieben Sie:
I get the following output on my svnfilter/load process
Revision 48502 committed as 48502.
svndumpfilter: No valid revision range 'start' in filtered stream
Started new transaction, based on original revision 48502
Hi
I'm wondering if there is a script that can be used to mirror every
commit done to a CVS server onto a SVN server.
I was thinking of writing something that can be invoked by the CVS
loginfo hook.
Thanks!
On 05/18/2013 08:33 PM, David Chapman wrote:
On 5/18/2013 12:01 PM, Zé wrote:
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches
in development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the
Guten Tag Zé,
am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013 um 10:20 schrieben Sie:
You are confused. This discussion is about how subversion lacks any
support for branching, which is quite obvious to anyone who
understands and acknowledges that all subversion does is track
revision changes to a file
Hi,
it seems that
svnlook cat
swallows byte order marks (e.g. \xEF\xBB\xBF) from committed files. Therefore
it is difficult to check for the presence or absence of BOMs in commit hooks.
Can anyone confirm that this is a bug in Subversion (at least in version:
1.7.7)?
--
Cheers
Alex
On 05/21/2013 10:53 AM, Alexander Veit wrote:
Hi,
it seems that
svnlook cat
swallows byte order marks (e.g. \xEF\xBB\xBF) from committed files. Therefore
it is difficult to check for the presence or absence of BOMs in commit hooks.
Can anyone confirm that this is a bug in
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Bob Archer bob.arc...@amsi.com wrote:
You are confused. This discussion is about how subversion lacks any support
for
branching, which is quite obvious to anyone who understands and
acknowledges that all subversion does is track revision changes to a file
-Original Message-
From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:24 AM
To: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First Class Objects?
.. snip
You keep saying svn
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Bob Archer bob.arc...@amsi.com wrote:
You are confused. This discussion is about how subversion lacks any
support for branching, which is quite obvious to anyone who
understands and acknowledges that all subversion does is track revision
changes to a
.. snip
You keep saying svn doesn't support branches yet I use branches
every day. While there is no way to list branches it would be
possible. I think the current implementation records the parent path
in the branch, but not vice versa... I assume svn doesn't do this
because it
Guten Tag Andreas Krey,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 22:41 schrieben Sie:
You mean like 'I expect tags to be immutable out of the box, and have
the VCS not modify them with perfectly normal operations, at least not
without adding -f or something to them'?
This sounds like Subversion
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 4:17 PM
To: Zé
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First Class Objects?
So what's the
Guten Tag Bob Archer,
am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013 um 17:54 schrieben Sie:
Frankly, if you are
writing to tags it is more like a branch. ;)
Of course, that's why it's all about definitions or conventions and my
writable tags are customer installations of our software which get
updated to new
-Original Message-
From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:24 PM
To: Andrew Reedick; Johan Corveleyn
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First
-Original Message-
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:41 AM
To: Bob Archer
Cc: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First Class Objects?
Of course
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Andrew Reedick
andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net wrote:
What do you mean by spurious log entries? When I look at the log (at
least in the tsvn log viewer) I only see revisions that have changes on
that path. I don't see every revision number unless I go to the
On 21.05.2013 20:26, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.05.2013 19:50, Andrew Reedick wrote:
Ooops. All of your immutable, static, locked down, haven't been touched in
months tags now have a new revision, and they all share that revision in
common. The parent dir change from /tags to /project1/tags
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Reedick
andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net wrote:
Right, right, it's the user's fault for failing to predict future namespace
needs. That the repository was created when the project was small and that
the user in question inherited the repo aren't valid
-Original Message-
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:33 PM
To: Andrew Reedick
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First Class Objects?
I'd call
-Original Message-
From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:32 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First Class Objects?
On 21.05.2013 20:26, Branko Čibej
On 21.05.2013 21:27, Andrew Reedick wrote:
Anyway, I'm nearly done with implementing my find common ancestor
script that seems resistant to edge conditions, so I'll stop rambling.
Ah ... if that's what started the whole thread ... have you considered
that the Subversion libraries already have
-Original Message-
From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:36 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First Class Objects?
On 21.05.2013 21:27, Andrew Reedick
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Reedick
andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net wrote:
I don't think true renames will necessarily fix the problem. Conceptually,
the problem is that the parent dir components of a branch/tag are
superfluous, e.g. given
-Original Message-
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:53 PM
To: Andrew Reedick
Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
aka Branches as First Class Objects?
From: Andrew Reedick andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net
-Original Message-
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:53 PM
To: Andrew Reedick
Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Andrew Reedick
andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net wrote:
We'll have to agree to disagree. We're back at the low level managing dirs
versus high-level managing baselines arguments/thinking/paradigms.
We're not completely opposed here. I can see the value of being
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:07:00 -0400:
On 05/21/2013 10:53 AM, Alexander Veit wrote:
Hi,
it seems that
svnlook cat
swallows byte order marks (e.g. \xEF\xBB\xBF) from committed files.
Therefore it is difficult to check for the presence or absence of
Guten Tag Andrew Reedick,
am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013 um 21:27 schrieben Sie:
It's about presentation. Keep the superfluous dir components
internal and hidden from the average user.
Clearly a -1/dislike from me. :-)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
--
Thorsten Schöning
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, May 21, 2013 at 16:04:59 -0500:
In any case, if you have ever published/announced a URL to your branch
to the group that will use it, you have a bigger problem than with the
tool itself if you change that location after the fact. Rather than
trying to change history
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, May 21, 2013 at 16:04:59 -0500:
In any case, if you have ever published/announced a URL to your branch
to the group that will use it, you have a bigger problem than with the
tool itself if
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, May 21, 2013 at 16:40:40 -0500:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, May 21, 2013 at 16:04:59 -0500:
In any case, if you have ever published/announced a URL to your branch
to the group that will
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:20:37PM -0400, Andrew Reedick wrote:
Metadata could work. A svn mkbranch command that would run svn
copy plus svn propset indicating that this is a branch root.
More than a week ago, this exact idea was already mentioned:
Hi All,
My apologies if this has been asked. A search of the archives doe not
show anything recent, and Google is returning a lot of spurious hits.
I'd like to use Subversion to manage a Git. Is anyone aware of a
plugin that offers the extensions? I was thinking something like: `svn
checkout
On Tue, 21 May 2013 21:55:51 +, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
...
I only need four or five basic commands -
checkout,
git clone $repo
update,
git pull --rebase (after committing your own stuff)
commit,
git commit -a git push (after a pull)
add (files),
git add files
remove (files).
git
34 matches
Mail list logo
