?????? Subversion Exception!

2013-06-26 Thread ??????????
Files and directories names are correct. This problem appears only once. In the show log dialog click on the menu 'get merge logs' for a file.this error occurred.

Re: WebDAV support in future versions of SVN server?

2013-06-26 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Harold wrote: > Is it still a long-term goal to maintain the ability to mount a SVN > repository as a WebDAV folder? Out of curiosity, why do you feel the need for this? Working in a remote copy isn't enough for your uses?

Re: Regarding the Voilation exception while creating the workspace

2013-06-26 Thread Amar Kumar Banda
Hi, I replaced svn version to the 1.7.10 and still facing same issue while creating the work space. * fix crash with --username option on Windows (r1396285). please could u explain clearly about this am not getting this. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > That's a

Re: Regarding the Voilation exception while creating the workspace

2013-06-26 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Amar Kumar Banda, am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2013 um 14:55 schrieben Sie: > I replaced svn version to the 1.7.10 and still facing same issue while > creating the work space. >  * fix crash with --username option on Windows (r1396285). > please could u explain clearly about this am not g

Question about subversion

2013-06-26 Thread Marc Davenne
Hi there. I have a question about subversion. I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you to tell me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please. If you see more files that should not be there, tell me and why. Files who should not be on SVN : *

Re: Question about subversion

2013-06-26 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Marc Davenne, am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2013 um 16:36 schrieben Sie: > Files who should not be on SVN : > > files automatically generated This depends on the files which get automatically generated and their purpose: It's perfectly valid to version automatically generated

Re: WebDAV support in future versions of SVN server?

2013-06-26 Thread Thomas Harold
On 6/26/2013 8:15 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Harold wrote: Is it still a long-term goal to maintain the ability to mount a SVN repository as a WebDAV folder? Out of curiosity, why do you feel the need for this? Working in a remote copy isn't enough fo

RE: Question about subversion

2013-06-26 Thread Bob Archer
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion. I think the previous response was quite correct, it mostly all depends. > I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you to > tell > me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please. If you see more > files th

Re: vimdiff wrapper for diff-cmd not working with 1.8

2013-06-26 Thread Michael Schlottke
On Jun 21, 2013, at 15:23 , Philip Martin wrote: > Another user raised the issue > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4382 > > Using '--diff-cmd colordiff' to get coloured output no longer works. > > Here's a solution that requires the user to mark the command as > requiring

RE: Question about subversion

2013-06-26 Thread Andrew Reedick
> From: Marc Davenne [mailto:marc.dave...@cramif.cnamts.fr] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:37 AM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Question about subversion > > Hi there. I have a question about subversion. > > > I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like

"svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)" after upgrade to 1.8

2013-06-26 Thread Craig Wenger
Since upgrading to Subversion 1.8.0 (r1490375) a few days ago, I have been unable to checkout (or update, after upgrading my working copy) a particular repository (http://www.sharedproteomics.com/OMSSA/svn). I get the error: svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request) This is somehow rela

Re: "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)" after upgrade to 1.8

2013-06-26 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Craig Wenger wrote: > Since upgrading to Subversion 1.8.0 (r1490375) a few days ago, I have been > unable to checkout (or update, after upgrading my working copy) a particular > repository (http://www.sharedproteomics.com/OMSSA/svn). I get the error: > > svn: E175

Re: Question about subversion

2013-06-26 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
2013/6/26 Marc Davenne : > Hi there. I have a question about subversion. > > I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you to > tell me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please. If you > see more files that should not be there, tell me and why. > > Files