Files and directories names are correct. This problem appears only once. In the
show log dialog click on the menu 'get merge logs' for a file.this error
occurred.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> Is it still a long-term goal to maintain the ability to mount a SVN
> repository as a WebDAV folder?
Out of curiosity, why do you feel the need for this? Working in a
remote copy isn't enough for your uses?
Hi,
I replaced svn version to the 1.7.10 and still facing same issue while
creating the work space.
* fix crash with --username option on Windows (r1396285). please could
u explain clearly about this am not getting this.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> That's a
Guten Tag Amar Kumar Banda,
am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2013 um 14:55 schrieben Sie:
> I replaced svn version to the 1.7.10 and still facing same issue while
> creating the work space.
> * fix crash with --username option on Windows (r1396285).
> please could u explain clearly about this am not g
Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you
to tell me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please.
If you see more files that should not be there, tell me and why.
Files who should not be on SVN :
*
Guten Tag Marc Davenne,
am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2013 um 16:36 schrieben Sie:
> Files who should not be on SVN :
>
> files automatically generated
This depends on the files which get automatically generated and their
purpose: It's perfectly valid to version automatically generated
On 6/26/2013 8:15 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Is it still a long-term goal to maintain the ability to mount a SVN
repository as a WebDAV folder?
Out of curiosity, why do you feel the need for this? Working in a
remote copy isn't enough fo
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
I think the previous response was quite correct, it mostly all depends.
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you to
> tell
> me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please. If you see more
> files th
On Jun 21, 2013, at 15:23 , Philip Martin wrote:
> Another user raised the issue
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4382
>
> Using '--diff-cmd colordiff' to get coloured output no longer works.
>
> Here's a solution that requires the user to mark the command as
> requiring
> From: Marc Davenne [mailto:marc.dave...@cramif.cnamts.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Question about subversion
>
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
>
>
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like
Since upgrading to Subversion 1.8.0 (r1490375) a few days ago, I have been
unable to checkout (or update, after upgrading my working copy) a
particular repository (http://www.sharedproteomics.com/OMSSA/svn). I get
the error:
svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)
This is somehow rela
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Craig Wenger wrote:
> Since upgrading to Subversion 1.8.0 (r1490375) a few days ago, I have been
> unable to checkout (or update, after upgrading my working copy) a particular
> repository (http://www.sharedproteomics.com/OMSSA/svn). I get the error:
>
> svn: E175
2013/6/26 Marc Davenne :
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
>
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you to
> tell me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please. If you
> see more files that should not be there, tell me and why.
>
> Files
13 matches
Mail list logo