Hi David,
I hate to sound like I'm stating the bleeding obvious, but what about just
looking at the authz file with a text editor?
It's not hard to interpret if your usernames are sensible. I've recently spent
a little while making sure the projects are sorted in a sensible order, so
finding
On 09/25/2013 11:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 16:19, Zé wrote:
Does subversion provide a way to commit all changes except those that affect
only whitespaces?
Nothing built in for that, no.
I recommend whitespace changes be a separate commit from functional changes.
But i
> From: Andrew Reedick
> > From: Geoff Field
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:27 PM
> > Hi Bert,
> >
> > From: Bert Huijben
> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2013 21:04 PM
> >
> >>I'll just reply in the html form as it will be very hard to
> > convert this thread to plain asc
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20:58AM +0200, Stephane D'Alu wrote:
> Version:
> Subversion: 1.8.3
> Ruby: 2.0.0.195
>
> Error message:
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.0/svn/info.rb:236:in `===': invalid byte
> sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError)
>
> It occurs in the "parse_diff_unified" meth
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:18:30PM -0400, Harlan Harris wrote:
>An FYI to all,
>I'm back trying to deal with this migration, and it's still a giant mess.
>The consistent problem seem to be that revision numbering is just flat
>wrong when files were renamed in a revision. I'm fi
An FYI to all,
I'm back trying to deal with this migration, and it's still a giant mess.
The consistent problem seem to be that revision numbering is just flat
wrong when files were renamed in a revision. I'm fixing "svnadmin load"
errors one-at-a-time by the following process:
1. Find in the dum
Hi Mark
Thanks, that's a very helpful suggestion.
Best regards
David
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 September 2013 16:06
To: David Aldrich
Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org' (users@subversion.apache.org)
Subject: Re: Recommendation for path-based authorisation auditing
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:02 AM, David Aldrich
wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for replying. By auditing, I mean the ability to easily see who
> has access to a specified folder. I think we already have the recording of
> changes covered. svnauthz_accessof looks interesting, but it
Hi Mark
Thanks for replying. By auditing, I mean the ability to easily see who has
access to a specified folder. I think we already have the recording of changes
covered. svnauthz_accessof looks interesting, but it reports whether a
specified user has access. I would prefer to ask 'who has
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, David Aldrich
wrote:
> We use path-based authorisation to control access to our svn
> repositories. The authorisation rules can be quite complex as we apply
> different authorisations across various branches and directories of our
> projects. It is quite hard t
Hi
We use path-based authorisation to control access to our svn repositories. The
authorisation rules can be quite complex as we apply different authorisations
across various branches and directories of our projects. It is quite hard to
be sure that the required permissions structure is corre
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Field [mailto:geoff_fi...@aapl.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:27 PM
> To: Bert Huijben; 'JANIKOVIC Jan'; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Problem with adding files in SVN 1.8.0+. Is it in the
> tracker already?
> Hi Bert,
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
