On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On 8/20/13 3:15 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
But from what I see process is stuck in
libaprutil-1.dll!7489fc50(), given the last message in debug
log is auth_ldap authenticate: using URL it most likely problem with
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
For new releases I will need to perform an update to
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Mark Kneisler
mark.kneis...@tceq.texas.gov wrote:
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these
Mark Kneisler mark.kneis...@tceq.texas.gov writes:
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
For
I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
Here's an idea.
Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to the
pristine directory only when a file is changed?
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 9:58 AM
To:
On 12/11/13 7:46 AM, Mark Kneisler wrote:
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
For new
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
For new releases I will need to perform an update to
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Bob Archer bob.arc...@amsi.com wrote:
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these environments will NEVER be
On 12/11/13 9:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Within reasonable limits it doesn't cost anything more to send more
network traffic. But the cost of client disks scales up by the
number of clients. Sometimes you can get by mounting a network disk
into all the clients, but then performance
On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
Here’s an idea.
Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
the pristine directory only when a file is changed?
You know, that's a great idea! I wonder
On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
Here’s an idea.
Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
the pristine directory only when a file is changed?
You know, that's a great idea!
On 11.12.2013 20:19, Bob Archer wrote:
On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
Here’s an idea.
Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
the pristine directory only when a file is changed?
You
On 11.12.2013 20:19, Bob Archer wrote:
On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
Here’s an idea.
Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
the pristine directory only when a file is
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Bob Archer bob.arc...@amsi.com wrote:
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On 12/11/13 9:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Within reasonable limits it doesn't cost anything more to send more
network traffic. But the cost of client disks scales up by the
number of clients. Sometimes you can get by mounting
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Bob Archer bob.arc...@amsi.com wrote:
Wouldn't that mean that you need to have some daemon service (or file
watcher or something) running to determine if a file is modified?
Yes.
Why would you need that in real-time instead of only when an svn
operation is
On 12/11/13 5:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Not exactly. Network traffic is generally bursty. Clients rarely
spend 100% of their time checking out files, so a very large number
could share a local network even if they always deleted their
workspaces and checked out fresh copies. But when
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Absolutely, the answer here isn't a one size fits all. Nobody is objecting to
the idea of allowing this. The problem is that the code is not designed to
allow this and it's a ton of work to change that. I can think of a good
On Dec 11, 2013, at 19:19, Les Mikesell wrote:
Also, it would mean you would need a constant connection to the server to
use a subversion working copy.
That's hardly a problem these days,
You apparently don’t try to work at the kinds of coffee shops I go to, where 50
college students are
On 12/11/13 7:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I guess I don't understand why it couldn't be as simple as having the
library get a pristine copy on demand if some operation needs it.
The original wc code had almost no abstraction around the pristines (as far as
I can recall, it's been a long time
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt
subversion-20...@ryandesign.com wrote:
On Dec 11, 2013, at 19:19, Les Mikesell wrote:
Also, it would mean you would need a constant connection to the server to
use a subversion working copy.
That's hardly a problem these days,
You apparently
21 matches
Mail list logo
