> Hi all,
> so my problem is clear : I've a working dir and I want to clean it
> up from
> all .svn folders, how to ?
> Knowing that I'm working un CLI within exec() function of PHP.
> Unfortunately
> I can't delete manually files and folders :
>
> Warning: unlink(svn/.svn/all-wcprops) [function.u
> The most obvious authorization scheme is that of the host server;
> if
> there is a user named "andy" on that server with a password
> "jackel"
> then I would like to simply be able to talk to the subversion
> server as
> user named "andy" password "jackel". This is how ssh and sftp work.
> But
>
> I'm wanting to set up networked subversion repositories. This is on
> a
> CentOS linux machine, I've got subversion 1.6.8 installed from rpm
> package.
>
> Due to the access methods needed by my users svnserve would be the
> best option. I've got the directory parent path /var/svn and under
> th
> Guten Tag Andy Canfield,
> am Dienstag, 19. Juli 2011 um 12:50 schrieben Sie:
>
> > [1] Why does it ask for the password for "andy", then ask for a
> user
> > name and password?
>
> The svn client first tried the last used user or your current
> username
> on underlying OS.
>
> > [2] What is a
BTW: I wasn't sure if I should approve your email to the list, seeing how it
was confidential and all.
From: Ankur Bhatnagar [mailto:ankur.bhatna...@symphonysv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 7:59 AM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject:
Hi,
I have set up a svn server on my machine and
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:14:13AM +0200, Vitus Piroutz wrote:
> > > "I do understand your frustration, believe me. We have had a
> number of complaints regarding this matter but the responsibility
> for fixing this does lie squarely with CollabNet et al, and I know
> that they have received more
> Given the following structure:
>
> /customerA/projA/
> /customerA/projB/
> /customerA/projC/
> ...
> /customerB/projX/
> /customerB/projY/
> ...
>
> Is there an easy way to grant someone rw-access to /customerA/projB
> *only*, that is without something like the following in authz?
>
> [/]
> th
> We are having problems with a large number of svn:mergeinfo
> properties
> being modified each time we merge. These svn:mergeinfo are on
> unrelated
> files to the actual change being made. Though it does seem as if
> they
> correlate to prior merges that have happened. If we commit these
> pr
> At 9:28 AM + 6/28/11, users-digest-h...@subversion.apache.org
> wrote:
> >From: Bob Archer
> >To: "Ken G. Brown" , "users@subversion.apache.org"
> >
> >Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:47:14 -0400
> >Subject: RE: access denied errors
> Hi, new here,
> I'm trying to get TortoiseSVN 1.6.16, Build 21511 - 32 Bit ,
> 2011/06/01 19:00:35, and Subversion 1.6.17 working on fully updated
> Windows 7 running under VMware Fusion Version 3.1.3 (416484) on my
> Mac.
> When I do an export from a repo into a new folder, I always get an
> err
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Stefan Sperling
> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:05:32AM -0500, Joshua Davies wrote:
> > Everything seems to be working, but when I load my repository
> from a web
> > server - e.g.
> >
> > https://hostname/repos
> >
> > I see my projects listed, along with
> I'm facing a problem where I get items modified by a merge although
> there should be nothing to merge at all.
>
> I create a new branch from trunk.
> I checkout from that new branch.
> I merge from trunk into the new branch.
>
> [ No intermediate commit did happen as I'm doing this on a person
>> is there a way to restrict users to commit only to a /branches vs
>> /trunk?
> Two ways..
>
> 1. Path based authentication... don't give them write access.
of course I meant path based authorization here. I would like to the book here,
but it doesn't seem to be coming up.
>
> 2. Pre-commit
Two ways..
1. Path based authentication... don't give them write access.
2. Pre-commit hook... have the hook not allow commits to /trunk (or course you
will need a way around the hook.)
BOb
From: alexus [mailto:ale...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 3:06 PM
To: users@subversion.apach
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Bob Archer
> wrote:
> >> Hey everyone,
> >> So here's what I'm trying to do and I'm wondering if I'm
> >> approaching
> >> this all wrong.
> >>
> >> First off, we are using Su
> Hey everyone,
> So here's what I'm trying to do and I'm wondering if I'm
> approaching
> this all wrong.
>
> First off, we are using Subversion for web site assets.
>
> Since its a website, its a very "organic" property. The method of
> developing towards an end goal and then releasing that, do
> > We have a lot of users using Subversion under Cygwin, which means
> that
> > any files they add get marked as executable by default (and
> almost
> > always uselessly). Is there any way to disable the automatic
> setting
> > of the svn:executable property on an "svn add"?
> > The closest thing
> I'm working on some software (spamassassin) that uses the
> subversion
> keyword "$LastChangedDate$". In the same file that it's used, I
> want that
> string to appear unmodified - not expanded by subversion, exactly
> as
> "$LastChangedDate$" instead of something like "$LastChangedDate:
> 2010-
> We have a lot of users using Subversion under Cygwin, which means
> that any files they add get marked as executable by default (and
> almost always uselessly). Is there any way to disable the
> automatic setting of the svn:executable property on an "svn add"?
> The closest thing I see in the ma
> I am struggling with an old version of subversion : 1.4.2 Is it
> safe for the repository to adopt the 1.6.16 version?
Yes... make sure you svn upgrade the repo or do a dump/load cycle to bring it
up to the newest repository format.
> Moreover I want to split an old repos in 2 new repos witho
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Stephen Butler
> wrote:
> >
> > On May 13, 2011, at 13:41 , K.L. wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Having problems with merge.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> me@localhost /srv/www/svnbugs/branches/branch1 $ svn merge
> >> svn+ssh://example.com/var/svn/svnbugs/trunk
> >> ---
> Hi Bob,
> > Does the same team us more than one repository? Or is each repo
> used by different people and teams?
> >
> >
> Some members of this team do work with other repositories. But this
> small team (7-10 active devs) is the only one that touches this
> problematic repository.
This makes
> Thanks for those tips Konstantin.
>
> There are about 16 developers. Is there anything I can look at on
> the
> server side to determine whether such bad directory copy/moves have
> been
> done, and perhaps by whom?
>
> > On the server: what protocol you are using to access the
> repository and
> On May 9, 2011, at 13:49, Bob Archer wrote:
>
> > It seems when I "svn add" unicode (UCS-2 Little Endian, I think
> it is) files svn applies the svn:mime-type of application/octet to
> the files.
>
> Correct.
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/sh
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Jim Garrison
> wrote:
> > There used to be a page at
> http://subversion.tigris.org/links.html
> > containing links to various 3rd-party tools for subversion,
> including some
> > web front ends. This page doesn't seem to have made the
> transition to the
> > ASF
It seems when I "svn add" unicode (UCS-2 Little Endian, I think it is) files
svn applies the svn:mime-type of application/octet to the files.
I found this in the archives:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-03/0173.shtml
However the thread seems to come to no conclusion.
My question is, if I
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 20:27, Totte Karlsson
> wrote:
> > Someone said that merges are easy.. I have read the svn book
> about merges
> > but it does not help.
> >
> > I create a branch and I can keep it synchronized with the trunk.
> > I can even re-integrate the branch with the trunk.
> >
> >
> > Perhaps
> >
> > [/]
> > ~jon = rw
>
> Nope. jon still able to check out the entire repository tree.
>
> So far, it seems that the only rules that make any difference are
> "* ="
> and "$authenticated =". These give everybody access. Without one of
> these present, nobody has access. And now I
> One of my team members made few changes to existing files in SVN.
> When I performed SVN update, status shown is "Completed :
> "
> But actually the files are not updated when checked for the
> changes.
> I tried to perform SVN clean and update, even then it is the same.
>
> When I deleted the f
> > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:45 -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've found using "*" to be non intuitive. Try:
> > >
> > > [/]
> > > $authenticated=rw
> > > jon=
> >
> > Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, jon still has full access...
> >
> > -Alan
>
> Are you sure he has
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:45 -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
> wrote:
>
> > I've found using "*" to be non intuitive. Try:
> >
> > [/]
> > $authenticated=rw
> > jon=
>
> Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, jon still has full access...
>
> -Alan
Are you sure he has "full" access? Path base
> I did a search of my email address in IE8 - to see what information
> is out there identifying me to everyone!
>
> I found this link:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-
> dev/201001.mbox/%3C1A60AD0697A8964EA981A8DE6F1DAE0908F8FCA0@BGGWRMB
> 01.bge.ie%3E
>
> and got my full n
> Often I have small changes that apply to a branch and the trunk
> alike. Of
> course I cannot do a normal merge because the local change doesn't
> have a
> revision number yet.
>
> If I copy the change from the branch to the trunk or vice versa and
> then
> commit it in one single commit, will i
> in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows.
Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host on
windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms FUD is going to
be bad for svn if it is widely said and published.
> what are common rea
> --
> From: "Bob Archer"
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:17 AM
> To: "Daniel Walter" ; "Stefan Sperling"
>
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: duplicate merge conflict
>
> >> >> Reco
> >> Record only should only make changes to the properties and not
> the files.
> >> You can also just manually update the svn:merginfo on the trunk
> if you
> >> want.
> >
> > I think the problem is that because Daniel is using ancestrally
> > unrelated trees for the left and right side of his me
> I'm currently working at the Subversion support for one of our
> applications (embedded via SharpSVN).
>
> Now, after operations like update and revert, we have to scan the
> working copy for changes, to decide whether we have to re-read the
> files
> into our application. For file changes, we c
> > Like I said, we don't even have a path named "trunk".
> >
> > The paths to the above versions in the repo would be like:
> >
> > svn://server/repo/project/v1.0.0
> > svn://server/repo/project/v1.0.1 (this was copied from the 1.0.0
> path)
> > svn://server/repo/project/v1.0.2 (this was copied
> > If you are merging everything in there is no need to worry. That
> is the
> > point of merge tracking. It will determine what has yet to be
> merged and
> > select the correct revisions.
> >
> > Here is how we have our repo set up... rather than using trunk.
> We find it
> > makes things easier
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:34:17PM -0400, Daniel Walter wrote:
> >> I understand what is going on now, but this seems to indicate
> that I
> >> will need to look up revision numbers from tags every time I do
> a
> >> merge in SVN. Is there any automated way of doing this? It
> seems
> >> like
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Daniel Becroft
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Alex Vincent
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm currently in the process of updating copyright notices where
> I work.
> >> To me, this is an ideal place for a SVN keyword:
> >>
> >> Copyright 2008-$Year$ MyCompa
> --
> From: "Bob Archer"
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:33 AM
> To: "Daniel Walter" ;
>
> Subject: RE: duplicate merge conflict
>
> >> When I merge changes in SVN, the merges work well ex
> When I merge changes in SVN, the merges work well except for the
> conflicts. For some reason, the merges are frequently (but not
> always done twice). As an example:
> <<< .working
> <<< .working
> const int SERIALIZE_FIELDS_DATA_LENGTH = 83;
> ===
> const int SERIALIZE_FIELDS_DATA
> > The machine on which my svn repository lives was recently
> > upgraded. I didn't have svnserve in a run-on-reboot script,
> > so I started it by hand (log in as "svn", then type "svnserve
> > -d"). But whenever I make any requests of the server (e.g.
> > "svn ls svn://localhost", much less "s
> The machine on which my svn repository lives was recently upgraded.
> I didn't have svnserve in a run-on-reboot script, so I started it
> by hand (log in as "svn", then type "svnserve -d"). But whenever I
> make any requests of the server (e.g. "svn ls svn://localhost",
> much less "svn update")
> I have a customer that is interested in purchasing and utilizing
> Subversion. I want to be sure that we architect the
> server/repository on the correct solution and couldn’t find much
> information on the recommended implementation path and architecture
> setups. If anyone is able to provide
> > Thanks for your answer. Our commits to /trunk are supposed to be
> > done rarely.
> > Basically we want to exclude source code of projects that for
> some
> > reasons cannot be built centrally (on the server where the
> > repository
> > is).
> > A project consists of java files in a directory a
> Thanks for your answer. Our commits to /trunk are supposed to be
> done rarely.
> Basically we want to exclude source code of projects that for some
> reasons cannot be built centrally (on the server where the
> repository
> is).
> A project consists of java files in a directory and an ant script
> On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 10:26 -0400, Bob Archer wrote:
> > > I read the SVN book, as there are three type conflicts: text,
> > > tree and
> > > properties conflict. However, I wanna know why it is a
> conflict.
> > > For
> > > example, if there
> Hi alltogether,
> is a reliable release date of Subversion 1.7 available with info
> about included or not included features? We need that for our
> strategy planning.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
> Hartmut
My plan would be plan to use 1.6 for another two years. 1.7 has been 3 months
away for seve
> I read the SVN book, as there are three type conflicts: text,
> tree and
> properties conflict. However, I wanna know why it is a conflict.
> For
> example, if there is a text conflict when I do merging code, I just
> know
> there is an conflict but don't know why it is a conflict.
It is a con
> > > I'm currently thinking about migrating from CVS to SVN, since
> SVN
> > > is said to be the successor of CVS.
> > > When analyzing the differences between CVS and SVN I found tags
> are
> > > treated in a different way in SVN, than they were treated in
> CVS,
> > > because the tag concept in
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Kevin Grover wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:13:34 -0700:
> >> When upgrading, mostly you can still access old repositories.
> SOMETIMES
> >> they will be silently upgraded in someways
> >
> > I don't know that the above sentence i
> I'm currently thinking about migrating from CVS to SVN, since SVN
> is said to be the successor of CVS.
> When analyzing the differences between CVS and SVN I found tags are
> treated in a different way in SVN, than they were treated in CVS,
> because the tag concept in SVN is: A tag is just a "s
> I am new to subversion and also not a Windows user.
>
> I am asked to create a repository for a company. The programmers
> will
> be using Windows PC's to do there work. But the files they are
> working
> on will be on a web server, not on there local PC. So there edits
> will
> be on remote fil
> On 03/24/2011 05:01 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> >> On 03/23/2011 08:02 PM, David Huang wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 23, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Pat Farrell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 03/23/2011 08:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> >>>&
> On 03/23/2011 08:09 PM, Pat Farrell wrote:
> > On 03/23/2011 09:02 PM, David Huang wrote:
> >> If you're sure that the mergeinfo is bogus, why not just delete
> it?
> >> e.g., svn propdel svn:mergeinfo
> fnfapp/src/java/com/fnfbook/bean/FilterListBase.java
> >
> > I'm sure. I'll try that.
> > I
> On 03/23/2011 08:02 PM, David Huang wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Pat Farrell wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/23/2011 08:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> >>> You are not giving much specifics, so how can people know what
> is going on
> >>> in your case?
> >>
> >> Specifics for complete 10
> I am executing:
> svn propedit svn:ignore .
>
> But this works only on the current directory. I like to have it
> work
> on all the directories beneath the current directory also. And if
> possible on the directories that will be created in the future.
>
> Is this possible?
If you ignore a
> Hi, I have been using CVS since 1998 and I am now finally moving to
> SVN. After having studied SVN for the last few weeks, getting the
> server prepared and working with clients, both console and GUI, I
> think I can use the accumulated experience for a simple migration
> and
> new SVN layout.
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 13:19, Nuno Carapeto
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Blair Zajac
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/17/11 12:50 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I have so SVN repos (subversion)
> > I am planning a migrate/upgrade SVN server that work at
> > windows 2003 server .
> >
> > My current version is 1.4 and I want to migrate to 1.6
> >
> > 1) Should I restart the windows server at the end of the
> > process ? Is it needed?
>
> As already mentioned, not the server but you will n
> Hello,
> I was working with some projects web that had this struture:
> follows below.
>
> - All projects was in three branches. One branch for bugs, one
> branch for improvement and one branch for deploy .
>
> So, I migrate each folder of project to a new project and began to
> use a T
> "Ada Battousai" schreef op 18/02/2011
> 06:36:40:
>
> > I'm trying to make a local repository (protocol svn://, without
> > apache) works with a password file with htpasswd entries. But my
> svn
> > does not recognize the passwords added there.
> > How can I configure svn to make it work?
>
>
> I have so SVN repos (subversion) and I use them with no proble. But
> when we do updates/commints on client (tortoise) we always get teh
> internal directories:
>
> conf
> dav
> db
> hooks
> locks
> format
> README.txt
>
> These es are internal and should not appear right? How do I remove
> thi
> I am planning a migrate/upgrade SVN server that work at windows
> 2003 server .
>
> My current version is 1.4 and I want to migrate to 1.6
>
> 1) Should I restart the windows server at the end of the process ?
> Is it needed?
>
> 2) Do anybody have the step by step of a same experience?
you
> > My machine is pretty beefy, so that's not the bottle neck.
> Network
> > speed to the remote svn server is OK, but not terrible, and
> > certainly not the bottle neck.
> It could be if it is a windows machine. Trying checking out to a
> RAM disk. I have found the performance is much much faste
> I notice that svn v1.7 is slated to have a new transfer protocol as
> well as new WC module.
>
> ( http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html )
>
> Right now, I have a repo with ~40,000 source and xml files.
>
> Full checkouts take forever.
That's why you shouldn't be doing "full" checkouts ve
> I'm learning subversion API right now and examining it's source
> code and
> examples. It's a lot of things in subversion source code that is
> called
> a "baton". For example, svn_cmdline_create_auth_baton() create
> "auth
> baton", and callbacks takes callback function pointer and, again,
> bat
> On Feb 11, 3:21 am, Thorsten Schöning
> wrote:
> > Guten Tag MonicaS,
> > am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011 um 17:33 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > > We are using an old
> > > version that we are going to upgrade as soon as we are
> confident that
> > > we understand the current configuration and setup.
>
> Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:27:17 -0600
> schrieb Ryan Schmidt :
>
> >
> > $ svnadmin create repo1
> > $ svnadmin create repo1/repo2
> > svnadmin: 'repo1/repo2' is a subdirectory of an existing
> repository
> > rooted at 'repo1' $ svnadmin create repo2 $ mv repo2 repo1 $ ls
> repo1
> > README.txt db
> On Thursday 10 February 2011, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:02:18PM +0100, Fabian Richter wrote:
> > > Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:24:09 -0600
> > > schrieb Ryan Schmidt :
> > > > On Feb 10, 2011, at 09:59, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > > >> and can you please add an --force swi
> > On Feb 10, 2011, at 09:59, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> > >> and can you please add an --force switch to
> > >> still being able to create Repositories within the path of
> another?
> > >
> > > That's a reasonable request, I think. Not a usual use case but
> why
> > > not?
> >
> > Really? What
> I just recently upgraded to svn 1.6.12 and had to realize
>
> svnadmin create
>
> wont let me create Repositories inside directories where have
> already
> repositories been created.
>
> Why is that a "feature" and can you please add an --force switch to
> still being able to create Repositori
> We are developing a fairly large application that uses open source
> libraries. We have one svn repo per application. Currently, the
> open source libraries are all stored with the application. This is
> a bad idea because the working copy and repo are now very large.
> Also, every branch gets a
> At work we use Subversion, and one of the developers have been
> developing a project for a while in an external git repos (he
> started
> the project when he was a consultant).
>
> Is there any way to import this into a new svn repos keeping
> history and
> everything?
>
I think you can use g
> Hello,
> we have following error with importing dump file fom svnimporter of
> polarion:
>
> codebeamer@af4hh087:/var/home/tmp_adm> svnadmin load
> /apps/codebeamer/CB-5.5.1-b02/repository/svn/ARUEHISTORIE/ <
> /var/home/tmp_adm/full_dump_20110128_102420.txt.bin
> <<< Started new transaction, ba
> On 2/1/2011 11:36 PM, Waseem Bokhari wrote:
> I am not using any email program But Only using my SMTP SERVER
>
> E:\Repositories\WSBokhari\hooks\send_message.exe %MESSAGE_FILE%
> %server% %to% %from% %subj% %auth%
>
>
> Then how would I mention this?
>
>
>
> You need to find a program that
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Geoff Rowell
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Nick
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:00 -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Neil Bird
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> We have a graphics-oriented code-base that's auto-gener
> I tried to create a new branch of a trunk that had some
> svn:externals definition.
> In particular, it pointed to a file.
>
> I.e.
> /somewhere/a.txt@4 a.txt
>
> I used
> svn copy svn://server/trunk branch
> And the output from that was the usual stuff including
> E a.txt (indicating an e
> Thanks for the link. I knew the -rREV method was supported I just
> feel that doing that for every externally referenced file is a pain
> and one more thing to keep track of. Oh well.
>
> Is there a way to search for all instances of an externally ref
> file in the entire repo? I think a "where
> > Option 2 is supported, and in fact is the recommended method.
> >
> > See:
> > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-
> book.html#svn.advanced.externals
>
> And if you want the externals references on your trunk to float
> with the
> trunk of the referenced item during development, one a
> > . Is there any best way to merge files in SVN or you need to
> > incorporate any strong merging tool?
>
> Text files are handled well by SVN's builtin merging capabilities.
> For other
> files, I don't know how to merge them. In practice, I consider
> anything
> non-textual as non-mergable, t
> > svnadmin create .\repository
> > svnserve -r .
> >
> > and a repository is created and served via svnserve. With the
> above
> > defaults, a third step is required, which can get tedious. I'd
> propose
> > enabling svnserve by default, and it can then be disabled if
> required. This
> > also ma
> Windows (if that can be considered "secure" in the first
> place),
> that would also be interesting. But I'm afraid I wouldn't be able
> to help with that.
Why all the hate? :)
Suffice to say, windows servers (these days) are only as secure as the admin
makes it. I guess that applies to *Nix
> I can also argue with the Principle of least astonishment:
>
> So say we've added a new svnadmin option --dont-create-svnserve-
> config,
> and we've made svnserve skip repositories which don't have an
> svnserve.conf file within them (putting aside the still unsolved
> problem
> of what svnserv
> 2010/12/28 Thorsten Schöning
> Guten Tag Philip Prindeville,
> am Montag, 27. Dezember 2010 um 22:28 schrieben Sie:
>
> > In our case, we're setting up a secured source repository inside
> > our network, for outside access (via port-forwarding on our
> gateway).
> In this scenario and if securi
> My former team member had put some code in a public repository
> sometime back.Currently I am the sole team member now and need to
> modify the code.
> I am relatively new to subversion and version control systems in
> general..
>
> I can checkout the code using
> svn checkout https://myproject.
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, David Weintraub
> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the
> future of
> > Subversion, from a technical point of view.
> >
> > On the other hand, the underlayi
> I experienced the following behavior with SVN. The steps i did are
> :
>
> 1- I made changes in a file
> 2- updated the file
> 3- Checked in the file after the merge succeeded
> 4- In the resulting file 6 lines disappeared.
>
> Is it considered as a bug?
> has anyone experienced such a behavior
> The updated version of that page of documentation for the current
> version of Subversion is:
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.props.html
>
> Good to know, thanks. Unfortunately Google returned the 1.1
> version of the doc for my query. For different queries, I see the
> We are planning to upgarde Subversion from 1.4.2 to 1.4.9. But i
> have a couple of questions regarding this.
> 1)what are the changes in 1.4.9 from 1.4.2 in terms of release
> notes?
1.4 is very out of date. That's probably why you can't find the release notes.
You strongly should consider upg
> in CVSNT there's a feature called magic branches. Basically it
> means that
> if you branch from head (or any other branch) the all the files in
> the
> magic branch will continue to have all changes made in the future
> until
> the point where you change them. So if you have 20 files and you
> c
> I'm wondering if there is a (de-facto) standard way of "end-of-
> lifing"
> projects in an SVN repository, or any suggestions for this from
> other
> users on this list ...
>
> With End-Of-Life I mean there will be no further maintenance on
> that
> project, no more development, no more releases
From: Coleman, Brandon [mailto:brandon.cole...@gohastings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:38 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: tracking multiple "test" groups
I currently use SVN with Feature branches that are tested, merged to trunk,
compiled and then sent to a small group of
> > > Hello World,
> > >
> > > I have implemented a feature into our product. To not break
> things
> > > for the other developers, I used a feature branch as described
> in
> > > the svn book. Now my implementation is complete, so I want to
> merge
> > > my branch back to trunk. In a fully updated
> > From: Gavin Beau Baumanis [mailto:b...@palcare.com.au]
> >
> > For our production repositories we're using 1.5.1
> >
> > My question is - is there an appropriate version to upgrade to?
> > We're tossing up between;
> >
> > Update to the latest 1.5.x
> > Update to 1.6.x
> > Or simply wait it out
> Hello World,
>
> I have implemented a feature into our product. To not break things
> for the other developers, I used a feature branch as described in
> the svn book. Now my implementation is complete, so I want to merge
> my branch back to trunk. In a fully updated working copy of the
> trunk
> On 12/02/2010 08:39 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
> >> $ svn update
> >> svn: Unable to lock 'utscmd'
> >>
> >> $ svn propget svn:ignore
> >> utspkg_src
> >> utscmd
> >> utslib
> >> utsbin
> >> utstool
> $ svn update
> svn: Unable to lock 'utscmd'
>
> $ svn propget svn:ignore
> utspkg_src
> utscmd
> utslib
> utsbin
> utstool
>
> utscmd is a subdirectory of the current working directory. It is
> included in svn:ignore. Why is svn even trying to lock this
> directory?
>
> The sequence of event
201 - 300 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
