Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:38:44PM +0100, Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote: >> I guess "badness" can happen only when accessing repositories locally (not >> via svn:// or http(s)://) with patched and not patched SVN.

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
t; unmodified svn 1.7.1 libraries and sometimes via forward-delta-patched > libraries. > > The part I left to the readers was determining whther or not Badness > will happen in the event of such "mixed" access. > > Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote on Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 13:20

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
roperability > issue, feel free to raise them on this list.) > > Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote on Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 13:07:52 +0100: >> Thanks, Daniel. That's the pointer I needed. >> However, I didn't understand what LAAEFTR means. >> >>

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
sitories created by an svn patched in this way will be > interoperable with repositories created by an unpatched svn is > LAAEFTR'd. I'd be cautious and change db/fs-type or db/format. > > Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote on Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:04:22 +0100: >> Hi Daniel, >

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
Nov 25, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote on Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:13:00 +0100: >> >>> Old BDB-backed repositories stored the older revision as fulltext and >>> newer revisions as deltas. >> >> Really? > > It

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
e making sure not to introduce a dependency loop in the direction > of deltas). > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.6#bdb-forward-deltas > > On Friday, November 25, 2011 1:08 AM, "Vyacheslav Zholudev" > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ho

BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-24 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
Hi, how does SVN 1.7.1 store fulltext and deltas in the BDB backend? From some time ago I remember that previous versions of SVN stored "almost" always a HEAD revision as fulltext, and others as reverse deltas.(except the case when a delta is bigger that fulltext) Was this behavior changed in S

Re: svnadmin load is slow for many small revisions

2011-11-16 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
why slowdown started to appear on a new version of linux distribution. Vyacheslav > > > Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 23:29:09 +0100: >> Hi all, >> >> After transition from debian lenny to squeeze I recompiled my version of SVN >> 1.4 (yes

svnadmin load is slow for many small revisions

2011-11-15 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
Hi all, After transition from debian lenny to squeeze I recompiled my version of SVN 1.4 (yes, I do need exactly 1.4). I tried to load a dump with many 1 file revisions into the BDB-based repository. First 300 revisions are committed really fast, like 10 revisions per second. After 1000 revisi