1.7.1: E200033: database is locked, executing statement 'RELEASE s0'

2011-11-01 Thread Neil Bird
I can't find any reference online to this error code. I am trying to do a command line 'svn cp' of one file to a new name in the same directory: $ svn cp 3.14.7.html 3.14.8.html svn: E200033: database is locked, executing statement 'RELEASE s0' This with a freshly upgraded (from 1.6.1

Re: 1.7.1: E200033: database is locked, executing statement 'RELEASE s0'

2011-11-01 Thread Daniel Shahaf
"database is locked" is the error SQLite would give when it tries to write to a database (.svn/wc.db) on which some other process already has a write-lock. The SQLite documentation: http://www.sqlite.org/atomiccommit.html http://www.sqlite.org/lockingv3.html states SQLite relies on POSIX advis

Re: 1.7.1: E200033: database is locked, executing statement 'RELEASE s0'

2011-11-01 Thread Neil Bird
Around about 01/11/11 12:12, Daniel Shahaf typed ... "database is locked" is the error SQLite would give when it tries to write to a database (.svn/wc.db) on which some other process already has a write-lock. The SQLite documentation: ... SQLite relies on POSIX advisory locks. Do those locks

Re: 1.7.1: E200033: database is locked, executing statement 'RELEASE s0'

2011-11-01 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:12 PM, "Neil Bird" wrote: > Around about 01/11/11 12:12, Daniel Shahaf typed ... > > "database is locked" is the error SQLite would give when it tries to write > > to a database (.svn/wc.db) on which some other process already has a > > write-lock. The SQLite

Re: 1.7.1: E200033: database is locked, executing statement 'RELEASE s0'

2011-11-01 Thread Neil Bird
Around about 01/11/11 13:22, Daniel Shahaf typed ... ... However you mentioned CIFS-mounted working copies, in which case the issue will be concurrent access not to the repository but to the working copy. Yeah, I said repo., but I meant WC! And I meant that I don't do more than one thing t

Re: 1.7.1: E200033: database is locked, executing statement 'RELEASE s0'

2011-11-01 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Neil Bird wrote on Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 16:13:05 +: > Around about 01/11/11 13:22, Daniel Shahaf typed ... > >... However you mentioned CIFS-mounted working > >copies, in which case the issue will be concurrent access not to the > >repository but to the working copy. > > Yeah, I said repo.,